AI Rate Professor

Nutrition & Dietetics

Erin Skoda

NUT100 · NUTRTION100 · HEAL101 · NUTR100 · NUTR125 · NUTRITION100 · NUTRITION10008 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
11.76%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you need this section; expect , and heavy busywork for a nutrition course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough grammar graderSlow to gradeHomework overloadBoring lecturesNutrition feels like English
  • nutrition work.
  • , and slow feedback frustrate students.
  • A minority of older online reviews call the class organized and doable if you follow directions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even and discussion boards, and As are uncommon in reported grades.

; a few early online students still found tests manageable.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Nutrition content is basic for many, but volume of , and strict scoring raise the real challenge.

Online content is often called basic; and grading.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and warn that skipping hurts your grade.

In-person is clearly attendance-heavy; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Would-take-again is about 12 percent, with repeated calls to pick another nutrition professor.

Negative consensus is strong online and in person, despite a few older glowing reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students say she docks discussion boards and and minor errors with .

Format shift

Harsh grammar focus appears in both online and in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and tests create overload for a 100-level course.

Format shift

Online and and .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common complaints are , and feeling uncared for, with only pockets of praise.

Format shift

; online pain centers on availability and .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and tests rather than one pure mode.

Format shift

Online tests and written work both matter; and scantrons.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews mostly call lectures dull PowerPoint reads with , and .

Main concern

Boring lectures plus tough grammar grading that feels unlike a nutrition course.

What students said

“Teacher is awful, Does not care about students. Takes weeks for her .”
NUTR125
“ and grades on your grammar ! this is a nutrition class not english .”
NUTR100
“Erin is a wonderful professor. Her lectures are awesome and packed with lots of information.”
NUTR100

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students split between early praise for clear structure and many , and homework overload.

Main concern

, and unforgiving late-work policy.

What students said

“She grades super tough and there is tons of course work.”
NUTR100
“Pretty easy if you've skimmed the chapter well enough to locate specific answers.”
NUTR100
“ ! TOTAL BURNT OUT!”
NUTRITION100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are conventional and not always guided; written work is graded like an English class.

Online testsScantron examsNo study guides oftenGrammar-sensitive written work

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, sometimes using scantrons, and sit beside heavy written homework.

Scantron testsNo study guidesLecture-based exams
“She uses a scantron for her testings”
2809
“ . .”
NUTR100

Online

Online tests are mentioned as chapter-based and doable if you can locate answers, with .

Online testsChapter lookupWritten assignments
“ . Pretty easy if you've skimmed the chapter well enough to locate specific answers.”
NUTR100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ . Plz stop teaching online”

⚖️

18/100

“Ive never heard of an online teacher taking points off for being incorrect in a discussion board.”

📦 Workload Overload

22/100

“ ! TOTAL BURNT OUT!”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Her lectures are so boring and she does not include the class whatsoever!
  • , and professional in person.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She grades super tough and there is tons of course work.
  • .
  • This class honestly feels more like an English class more then a nutrition class.

Theme 3

⏱️

  • Takes forever to grade.
  • Takes weeks for her .
  • Takes her weeks just to grade one thing

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-nine reviews across many years with a , and workload.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 512
1 out of 513

Course coverage

NUTR10027 reviews
NUT1004 reviews
HEAL1012 reviews
1001 review
28091 review
Show 4 more courses
NUTR1251 review
NUTRITION1001 review
NUTRITION100081 review
NUTRTION1001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

5

C 5

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 6