AI Rate Professor

Art

Joshua Eggleton

ART157 · ART101 · ART100 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
86.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a passionate hands-on art teacher who grades fairly for honest effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHands-on art coachGreat feedbackChill and hilariousFair if you tryClass playlists
  • Students call him one of the , and real skill growth.
  • Grades reward effort and participation more than raw talent, with many A and A+ outcomes.
  • Expect , and roughly $50 to $80 in art supplies.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Many A and A+ grades when students try, attend, and complete projects; effort matters more than innate talent.

Online and in-person both reward trying; ART157 lecture section is especially grade-friendly.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Content is accessible for first art classes but , and quizzes.

online module weeks.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and warn that missing class means falling behind or .

; in person is stricter.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Strong majority praise, roughly 87 percent would take again, and .

; in-person enthusiasm is strongest.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

79/100

and improvement; a few call him a tough critic but not unfair.

Format shift

Online reviews stress try-and-get-a-good-grade; in person agrees with occasional tougher critique notes.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Projects, weekly reading or quizzes, and but are manageable with steady work.

Format shift

Online can be finished in focused blocks; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

, and humor make him a standout art instructor.

Format shift

Quality is high online and in person; one old outlier called him rude.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Blend of projects, critiques, quizzes, discussions, and .

Format shift

Studio ART100 leans projects and critiques; ART157 can be more lecture and test based.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person he is celebrated for demos, critiques, music playlists, and turning beginners into real artists when they show up.

Main concern

Attendance and participation matter, and materials lists can get pricey.

What students said

“One of the .”
ART157
“As long as you show up and listen to the lectures, you won't have to do a and you will get an A.”
ART157
“He turns students who couldn't even draw boxes, into artists!”
ART100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students like , and enjoyable discussions, with moderate project time.

Main concern

and supplies can cost around $80.

What students said

“He has videos showing you step to step instructions on how to use the materials. He is not a , as long as you show that you're trying.”
ART100
“He's very attentive to your needs and concerns. The but they do require you to put some work in it.”
ART101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and and slides; studio success hinges more on projects and critiques.

Section quizzesStudy guidesLecture-slide answersCritiques

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides; some lecture courses are test heavy but still passable if you attend.

Easy quizzes if you studyQuiz answers in slidesTest heavy lecture option
“ .”
ART100
“ if you know the materialpay attention.”
ART157

Online

Online quizzes and discussions matter; chapter quizzes can be annoying but not heavily weighted.

Chapter quizzesDiscussion postsExtra credit
“The found online, but they dont count for that much.”
ART100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews (3 online, 22 in , and studio culture. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“His teaching method is very relaxed and easy going. If you need help he will stand right next to you and assist you as much as he can.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“Easy and if you can!!!”

⚖️

80/100

“while he'll give you constructive criticism, he'll give you a good grade for trying.”

🎨 Skill Growth

92/100

“I have zero natural talent or experience, and halfway through the semester I'm drawing things I never would have thought possible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hands on type of professor
  • instructional videos for each assignment
  • creates a comfortable, engaging, non-judgmental environment

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • not a , as long as you show that you're trying
  • impossible to fail
  • grade I had to work for

Theme 3

🎵 About Class Vibe

  • uncanny taste in corduroy jackets with elbow patches
  • Creates a class playlist every few weeks
  • plays awesome music

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five detailed reviews over many years with , and teaching quality.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART10016 reviews
ART1574 reviews
ART1013 reviews
1572 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 6 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1