AI Rate Professor

Media Arts amp Technologies

Melvin Terry

MAT110 · FUK101 · MAT135 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take him only if and and high workload.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of HomeworkPolarizingCaring MentorPicky FeedbackProject Heavy
  • Students either call him one of the , and tedious.
  • Expect lots of homework and .
  • Effort is rewarded if you submit on time and follow rubrics carefully.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

A grades appear for students who work hard and follow rubrics, but and As.

Online fans report earnable As with effort; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is not always conceptually brutal, but volume of projects and picky standards raise the load.

Online and and projects.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

while others do not, and participation still matters.

; online is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

About 62 percent would take again, with strong praise from fans offset by harsh detractors.

Online reviews are polarized; in-person is mixed but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Fair if you follow rubrics and naming rules, but picky zeros and .

Format shift

Online emphasizes picky file naming; .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of homework and .

Format shift

Both formats repeatedly tag lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Polarized between inspiring, caring instruction and boring or mean experiences with .

Format shift

Online contains both strongest praise and strongest criticism; in-person is milder but mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Projects and becoming major in some sections.

Format shift

Online is project-heavy; 40 percent.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person feels laid back but project-heavy; while other work is easier.

Main concern

Weekend projects are tedious and .

What students said

“LOTS of weekend projects. They're easy, but very tedious and time consuming.”
MAT135
“Quizzes (40% of grade) are impossible. Avg on each was a D, but .”
MAT110

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are highly split between loving his care and organization versus , and pickiness.

Main concern

and picky file or .

What students said

“I love Prof Mel! Surprised at so many bad reviews. Dont believe them!”
MAT110
“Makes the class difficult with hard-to-understand instructions.”
MAT110
“ , but and is totally willing to work with his students.”
MAT135

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Projects and , but some sections include hard uncurved quizzes that heavily affect grades.

Project HeavyHard QuizzesNo Curve on QuizzesRubric Based

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence shows hard quizzes that average around a D with .

Hard QuizzesNo CurveProject HeavyTEST HEAVY
“Quizzes (40% of grade) are impossible. Avg on each was a D, but .”
MAT110
“LOTS of weekend projects. They're easy, but very tedious and time consuming.”
MAT135

Online

Online comments focus on projects and .

ProjectsHomework HeavyRubric Feedback
“ and homework because he can get pretty picky with the .”
MAT110
“Gives zeros if you don't name files his way, even if perfect.”
MAT110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and wants his students to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 , and picky standards. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“I love Prof Mel! Surprised at so many bad reviews. Dont believe them!”

📚 Workload Reality

24/100

“LOTS of weekend projects. They're easy, but very tedious and time consuming.”

⚖️

48/100

“Gives zeros if you don't name files his way, even if perfect.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • one of the
  • He sucks and his class is boring
  • really nerdy and funny, makes the in-class time fun

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • Quizzes (40% of grade) are impossible
  • Easy to get 100%+ on everything else

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • genuinely caring and wants his students to succeed
  • mean professor I have ever met
  • Super caring teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across 2018-2022 with rich detail, but opinions are highly polarized so conclusions need caution.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MAT1105 reviews
MAT1352 reviews
FUK1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1