AI Rate Professor

Communication

Michelle van Wolferen

COMM101 · COMM207 · COMM100 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Strong pick for in-person public speaking if you want a ; avoid relying on her online section based on the one negative report.

Best fit · Easy A HunterAmazing lecturesCaring and funnyClear gradingEasy speechesLight homework
  • In-person students , and chill public-speaking classes.
  • Grades are very high with light workload and only a couple of short speeches.
  • The single online review reports she disappeared mid-course and the department had to step in.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Nearly all reported grades are A or A+ and students say do the work and participate and you pass easily.

Online still gave an A despite absence; .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Public speaking with only , and discussion-heavy format keeps intellectual load low.

Online was low difficulty by default due to missing work; in-person is intentionally easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, so policy is not consistent.

; in-person reports both mandatory and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

About 88% would take her again and in-person comments call her one of their favorites.

In-person is MustTake; the lone .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

and repeated A/A+ outcomes with little risk of failing.

Format shift

Strongest leniency evidence is in-person; online still awarded an A.

Workload

Light

82/100

and only about two short speeches in a typical term.

Format shift

In-person is light; online had almost no work after unit one.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

, and feedback; the online case is a major negative outlier.

Format shift

Excellent in person; poor online reliability in the single review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grade is driven by speeches, participation, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person COMM101/COMM207 students rave about , and an easy path to A/A+.

Main concern

Some wish for and speeches.

What students said

“LOVED this professor. Super easy going, easy to talk to and cares about her students”
COMM101
“There should not be a reason for anybody to fail or get a C.”
COMM207
“Amazing professor and !”
COMM101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online COMM100 student says she was present for unit one then vanished for over 10 weeks until the department intervened.

Main concern

Instructor absence and lack of coursework for most of the term.

What students said

“Teacher was present for the first unit, then disappeared. Received no course work for over 10 weeks.”
COMM100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is speech and participation heavy with .

Speech-based finalsFew homeworkParticipation matters

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections focus on two short speeches, discussion, and .

Two short speechesSpeech finalParticipation
“Only two speeches during the entire semester. One of them is the final.”
COMM207
“The and she will give you your grade the same day.”
COMM101

Online

Online ; coursework largely stopped after unit one.

Minimal coursework
“Received no course work for over 10 weeks. The department head stepped in the last 2 weeks.”
COMM100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Class is super easy. She is super smart and knows her stuff... There should not be a reason for anybody to fail or get a C.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews (7 in-person, 1 online), highlighting strong in-person praise versus online absence. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Great professor, by far one of my favorites.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“Amazing professor and !”

📈 Easy Grades

88/100

“Do the assignments and participate and you will pass.”

⚠️ Online Reliability

25/100

“Teacher was present for the first unit, then disappeared. Received no course work for over 10 weeks.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and will really talk to you about what you need to improve.
  • The lectures are enjoyable.
  • Most definite a very chill Professor!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class is super easy.
  • Only two speeches during the entire semester.
  • it was an easy class to pass.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • cares about her students learning how to public speak
  • She has a very open forum type of teaching
  • super easy going, easy to talk to

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed reviews with strong consistency for in-person quality; only one online case limits format comparison.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMM2074 reviews
COMM1013 reviews
COMM1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1