AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Gabriel DeLaRosa

PSYC121 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Prefer him in person if you want real lectures and feedback; and test-heavy, so only take it if and exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyAmazing lectures in personReading heavy onlineAccessible outside class
  • In-person students praise caring lectures and .
  • Online reviews often , and vague nitpicky tests.
  • can still be high.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

and takes real grind even when some students still earn A.

; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students call it challenging, reading-heavy, and detail-oriented rather than conceptual.

Both formats report challenge; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple reviews mark attendance mandatory when reported, especially in stronger in-person and one online case.

In-person explicitly mandatory; online sometimes not stated.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and in-person teaching, not for ease.

In-person strongly recommends; online is split and often negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and test-heavy comments outweigh occasional high final grades.

Format shift

Online tests described as nitpicky; .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of reading and , but some while tests dominate.

Format shift

; online is reading and .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Strong in-person lectures and care, but online students often feel untaught and low priority.

Format shift

Excellent in person, weak online presence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and quizzes with fewer other graded items.

Format shift

Online especially test heavy; in-person still challenging.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students call him great with , and care, while still labeling the course challenging and him a .

Main concern

Challenging pace and .

What students said

“Mr Delarosa was great he made sure I learned all of the topics and really cares good lectures as well.”
PSYC121
“ and making sure that we understood the topics.”
PSYC121

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online PSYC121 leans on textbook chapters, sparse discussion, and .

Main concern

, and feeling you only learn from the book.

What students said

“He did not teach anything. Incredibly boring. and detail-oriented”
PSYC121
“The questions are astonishingly vague and tricky.”
PSYC121
“I learned a lot, but I think I could have gotten it all from just the book.”
PSYC121

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and are described as tough, vague, and detail-oriented.

Test heavyTough testsVague questionsReading quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but confirm a challenging course with and strong lecture support.

Tough graderChallenging course
“challenging course”
PSYC121
“ and making sure that we understood the topics.”
PSYC121

Online

Online course uses heavily graded tests and quizzes with nitpicky detail questions and limited teaching support.

Test heavyNitpicky detail testsQuizzesDiscussion boards
“ and detail-oriented rather than conceptual.”
PSYC121
“a substantial amount of your grade .”
PSYC121
“The questions are astonishingly vague and tricky.”
PSYC121

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I barely clung to life by the end of this course, due to the intense apathy towards the course by De La Rosa.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (4 online, 2 in-person), highlighting format split on teaching and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 In-Person Teaching

85/100

“Mr Delarosa was great he made sure I learned all of the topics and really cares good lectures as well.”

📝

30/100

“a substantial amount of your grade .”

⚖️

32/100

“ and detail-oriented rather than conceptual.”

📚 Self Study Load

40/100

“I think I could have gotten it all from just the book.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very interesting class, I learned a lot
  • He did not teach anything. Incredibly boring.
  • really cares good lectures as well

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The questions are astonishingly vague and tricky.
  • challenging course

Theme 3

📖 About Online Work

  • Get ready to read
  • mostly assigned readings, sparse discussion boards, quizzes, 3 exams
  • Due dates are often written incorrectly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews with ; sample is small but comments are detailed and thematically consistent by format.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYC1216 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values