Jeff Uhlik

IMT135 · MAT155 · MAT135 · MAT185 · MAT290 · MAT270 · IMT120 · IMT · TYPOGRAPHY · IMT125 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 38/100
RMP rating: 3.3/5
Take again: 33.33%
Difficulty: 3.0

The decision

if you want brutal real-world design critique and can self-manage messy organization.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing design mentorDisorganized course sitesHarsh critiquesHeavy project iterationsOutdated tools risk

Serious design students praise tough critiques and growth; others call him chaotic and unfair.
Online sections draw strong complaints about dual personal sites and no Canvas.
Success requires constant iterations and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

As require many design iterations, heavy critique response, and sustained project effort; .

Online reviews stress navigation chaos; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Graphic design expectations and multiple iterations make the content and process demanding for casual students.

Both formats report high effort; online adds site confusion on top of design challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

while others say no; participation still matters for critiques.

; several in-person reviews mark it yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

; passionate fans exist, but recent online and many studio complaints dominate risk.

Online evidence is mostly strongly negative; and disaster.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

, and grade-on-effort-plus-result norms keep standards high.

Format shift

Online and ; redo options appear more in older in-person notes.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

, and repeated design iterations make the load heavy.

Format shift

Both formats mention high work volume; .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Passionate industry feedback for some students clashes with disorganization, outdated tools, and rude communication for others.

Format shift

In-person reviews are deeply split; online reviews are mostly poor on structure.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and critique cycles rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Consistent across online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

: devoted students call him a gem for honest critique, while others cite favorites, outdated software, and chaos.

Main concern

Harsh critiques, favoritism claims, and disorganization can sink students who need structure.

What students said

“Jeff is an incredible professor. He wants students to create many design iterations for every assignment.”
MAT290

“Wanted to learn to use illustrator or Photoshop, instead he teaches in Fireworks (an Adobe program that doesn't exist anymore)”
MAT135

“This guy is so .”
MAT270

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MAT sections struggle with dual personal websites instead of , and hard-to-read interfaces.

Main concern

, and disorganization dominate recent online feedback.

What students said

“He refuses to use the Canvas site, but instead uses a mixture of TWO of his own sites, both of which are badly constructed.”
MAT155

“He refuses to use the to navigate.”
MAT135

“ and hard at first but soon becomes easy peasy.”
MAT135

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly projects and critiques; reviews do not clearly prove proctored exams.

Project-based assessmentCritique-driven gradesRedo options sometimesLittle formal exam talk

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and harsh critiques rather than classic exams.

Project iterationsHarsh critiquesOptional redos

“You do get the option to redo anything that was turned in on time for more credit, but it's really just a lot of work.”
MAT135

“He often gives very harsh critiques, and doesn't sugarcoat anything he says.”
MAT290

Online

Online reviews focus on assignment portals and .

Assignment-heavyPersonal websites not Canvas

“Good luck understanding understanding what the !”
MAT155

“He clearly puts A LOT of time into his students and gives lengthy instructions and feedback.”
MAT135

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Put 100% into everything you create and you will succeed!”
Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews (3 online, 25 in-person), highlighting polarization on organization versus design growth. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Organization Crisis

30/100

“He refuses to use the Canvas site, but instead uses a mixture of TWO of his own sites, both of which are badly constructed.”

🎨 Design Growth For The Serious

75/100

“Jeff is an incredible professor. He wants students to create many design iterations for every assignment, but know it will truly help you grow as a designer if you put effort into it.”

📉 Recommendation Risk

36/100

“If .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

He's honest, funny, caring, patient, eager to help those wanting to learn.
TALKS TALKS TALKS answers his phone in class.
scatter brained...but in a good way

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

His class is not for the lazy student.
Asks for a ton of work.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

This class felt like it came from 2001.
badly designed website.
as early morning on a holiday, that you have an .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

28 reviews with and long time span show stable polarization rather than noise.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514

4 out of 51

3 out of 53

2 out of 53

1 out of 57

Course coverage

MAT13511 reviews

IMT1254 reviews

IMT2 reviews

MAT1552 reviews

MAT1852 reviews

Show 6 more courses

MAT2902 reviews

1201 review

IMT1201 review

IMT1351 review

MAT2701 review

TYPOGRAPHY1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

A 2

B range

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 1

Jeff Uhlik

x x x if you want brutal real-world design critique and can self-manage messy organization.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Varies

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

⚠️ Organization Crisis

🎨 Design Growth For The Serious

📉 Recommendation Risk

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

💻 About Online Experience

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you want brutal real-world design critique and can self-manage messy organization.