AI Rate Professor

Psychology

L. Fast

PSYC101 · PSYC114 · PSYCH101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Prefer her in person if you like engaging lectures and ; be cautious about the online section based on the lone negative review.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInteresting lecturesClear explanationsTest-focusedFun psych teacherLecture notes online
  • Older in-person reviews strongly praise clear, fun psych teaching with .
  • One recent online review calls the class horrible, test-heavy, lecture-heavy, and hard.
  • Little hard data on grades or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

In-person comments say tests are doable from notes with , but and test-heavy.

In person sounds easier; the single online review is much harder and negative.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

and manageable, offset by one online difficulty 5 review.

Online evidence is tougher than the older in-person set.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

and , though formal mandatory status is not clearly proven.

; online does not clarify attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, while the recent online review would not take her again.

Recommendation is high for in person and poor for the online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

In-person students say you do fine if you attend and study notes; .

Format shift

Online .

Workload

Light

72/100

Barely any homework and .

Format shift

Online tags stress reading and .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

In-person praise for clarity, humor, and expertise is strong; one online review sharply disagrees.

Format shift

Teaching praise is almost entirely in person; online is negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Quizzes and tests matching lectures are the main assessment theme, with .

Format shift

Both formats mention tests; online also tags test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe fun, clear, interesting psych lectures, , and tests aligned with lectures if you attend.

Main concern

Attend class and because quizzes and .

What students said

“ ! She really knows psych and is really good at teaching.”
PSYCH101
“ ! and the if you study the lecture notes!!”
PSYC101
“Her lecture notes are available online which makes it easy to study for tests.”
PSYCH101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One online PSYC101 review rates quality 2 and difficulty 5, calling the class horrible with test-heavy and lecture-heavy tags.

Main concern

Recent online experience reports high difficulty and .

What students said

“horrible”
PSYC101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests largely mirror lectures and notes; one student notes lowest test dropped. Reviews .

Lecture-based testsFrequent quizzesDrops lowest test

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

help, and one review says lowest test is dropped.

Lecture-based testsFrequent quizzesDrops lowest test
“has quizes often so attend class! and the ”
PSYC101
“the if you study the lecture notes!!”
PSYCH101

Online

Online review is test-heavy and difficult but .

Test heavy
“horrible”
PSYC101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! She really knows psych and is really good at teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting in-person teaching praise versus one harsh online review. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“She makes it fun and makes sure everyone understands...take her class if you can!”

🧪

65/100

“the if you study the lecture notes!!”

💻 Online Caution

25/100

“horrible”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lisa is a really REALLY good teacher. She is quirky and very interesting!
  • Her lectures are very interesting and easy to follow.
  • she made learning fun and exciting!

Theme 2

📈

  • !
  • Test heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews total with and only one recent online critique; consistency is mixed by format and age.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH1014 reviews
PSYC1012 reviews
PSYC1141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values