AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Sue Simpson

HEALT101 · NUR274 · NUR155 · NURS274 · NUR281 · LVN · NURSING · NURS155 · N281 · NUR173 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Strong pick for motivated nursing students who can handle high expectations; think twice if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnows nursing contentCaring clinical instructorTest heavyPersonality dependentOnline organization mixed
  • Many clinical and nursing students call her knowledgeable, helpful, and sometimes the .
  • A recurring minority finds her rude, moody, sarcastic, or personality-driven in .
  • Online sections can be easy content-wise but criticized for , and picky quiz scoring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some online students get easy As by reading and memorizing, while nursing clinicals carry high expectations and .

Online often easier grade-wise; in-person nursing is more demanding and personality-sensitive.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Average difficulty sits mid-high; content-heavy nursing and clinical rigor offset a few easy online sections.

Online NURS155 can feel easier; clinicals and older nursing courses read harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and others none; online attendance is not required in the recent online reviews.

Online attendance optional in cited reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and comments split between life-changing nursing mentor and rude or manipulative instructor.

In person is more polarized praise/criticism; online is mixed organization vs easy A.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Several students earn As, but tough-grader tags and claims of .

Format shift

; in-person fairness is described as personality-dependent.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Reading, tests, clinical expectations, and content-heavy nursing material keep workload moderate rather than light.

Format shift

Online emphasizes reading and quizzes; clinicals add higher real-world expectations.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Strong content mastery and clinical teaching praise outweigh repeated complaints about mood, sarcasm, and weak online presence.

Format shift

In-person clinical teaching praised more; online interaction often criticized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy and quiz-centered comments dominate, with some and reading-heavy prep.

Format shift

Online reviews stress quizzes and tests; in person also tags test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person and clinical nursing reviews often praise expertise, humor, and high standards, while some students call her rude, moody, or harsh if she dislikes you.

Main concern

Personality fit matters; weak students may feel targeted or unsupported.

What students said

“Amazing instructor ! could not have done it with out her”
NUR281
“This 'teacher' is rude, sarcastic, and is heartless to her students.”
N281
“Mrs. Simpson is great! She's funny and competent at the same time, especially in clinicals!”
NUR274

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online nursing courses range from easy A with textbook memorization , and picky auto-grading.

Main concern

Organization and instructor interaction quality can feel poor online even when grades are high.

What students said

“ . .”
NURS155
“pretty easy to get an A as long as you follow the steps.”
NUR155
“a missing space, comma, etc will net you 0 points even if your answer is correct.”
NUR155

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are often test- and quiz-driven with content memorization; reviews do not clearly prove webcam or lockdown proctoring.

Test heavyQuiz-based onlineContent memorization

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person nursing reviews mention test-heavy courses and high clinical expectations but .

Test heavyClinical expectations
“TEST HEAVY”
N281

Online

Online quizzes and formatting; may count as regular work. Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring software.

Canvas quizzesTest heavyPicky auto-grading
“ and there is no as she counts it as an extra assignment.”
NURS155
“Put ALL poss. answers into the net you 0 points even if your answer is correct.”
NUR155

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Amazing instructor ! could not have done it with out her”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting clinical expertise, personality polarity, and online organization issues. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“The . God Bless Her.”

⚠️ Personality Risk

35/100

“This 'teacher' is rude, sarcastic, and is heartless to her students.”

💻 Online Organization

30/100

“ . .”

📈 Easy Online Path

75/100

“pretty easy to get an A as long as you follow the steps.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is extreemly smart. She drove home the nursing process
  • This teacher ROCKS. She knows her stuff, and teaches it well.
  • She . She is worthless

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Always ready to help @ any time.
  • Very moody and unpredicable.
  • If she likes you-great. If she doesn't -look out!

Theme 3

💻 About Online Courses

  • I am unsure whether she knows .
  • Only interacted with class via automated updates
  • You should read the text and memorize the terms.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across many years provide useful volume, but older sparse comments and strong praise-versus-hostility splits lower certainty.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NURS2745 reviews
NUR1733 reviews
NURSING3 reviews
LVN2 reviews
NUR1552 reviews
Show 5 more courses
HEALT1011 review
N2811 review
NUR2741 review
NUR2811 review
NURS1551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values