AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jill Nelipovich

MATH112 · MATH64 · MATH30 · MATH131 · MATH110 · MATH6404 · MATH126 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Prefer her in person; online sections are hit-or-miss and need strong self-discipline.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyMyMathLab focusedExtra credit friendlyOnline inconsistencyScatterbrained but caringPartial credit
  • , and fair with .
  • Online reviews frequently cite late posts, missing lectures, and poor communication.
  • Content difficulty is usually manageable with MyMathLab practice.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many report easy tests, partial credit, , and high grades when work is completed, especially with MyMathLab.

Both formats can yield As; online is easier content-wise but chaotic to manage.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Algebra and ; a few accelerated or online sections feel faster or messier.

; online difficulty varies more by organization than content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some in-person sections require attendance; .

Online is more flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

About half would take again; .

In-person leans WorthIt; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Partial , and half-credit for half-right work appear often.

Format shift

Leniency shows in .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

; some report a lot of work or random due spikes online.

Format shift

Online random due dates make workload feel heavier than in person.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Warm and ; online lectures have errors and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and MyMathLab work share weight; tests matter but are not the only path.

Format shift

Both formats rely on MyMathLab plus exams; online adds discussion boards inconsistently.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students often call her nice, funny, and and , though a few find the pace fast or scatterbrained.

Main concern

Occasional off-topic tangents and uneven organization.

What students said

“I love her! She is a kind and perfect teacher.”
MATH126
“ and fun.”
MATH112
“Jill rocks!”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online courses can be relaxed and MyMathLab-friendly for some, but many report random due dates, missing lectures, wrong , and vanishing communication.

Main concern

Inconsistent posting, weak email response, and .

What students said

“She posts all the assignments upfront, so they go past due before the .”
MATH131
“This is a relaxed online class!”
MATH126
“ if possible.”
MATH131

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often described as easy with and partial credit; online study guides can have wrong keys.

Easy testsExtra creditPartial creditStudy guides sometimes wrongMyMathLab practice

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests are frequently called easy with reviews, , and partial credit for work shown.

Easy testsExtra creditPartial creditTest-day reviews
“The tests were so easy and she offers too.”
MATH126
“She gives partial credit if you show work on the if you get the answer wrong.”
MATH30

Online

Online exams and practice can be poorly timed with incorrect and late study materials.

Incorrect answer keysLate practice finalsMyMathLab
“She posts study guides with incorrect .”
MATH131
“Practice for exam appointment & the answers were not released.”
MATH131

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, not the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews (9 online, 10 in-person), highlighting format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ and will help if you need it.”

💻 Online Experience

30/100

“She never replies to her emails and doesn't help .”

😊 Classroom Vibe

80/100

“ and fun.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a kind and perfect teacher.
  • she is a bit scatterbrained, but she does care about you knowing the material.
  • Often makes mistakes in lectures.

Theme 2

💻 About Online Format

  • so I would check and notice we had a .
  • communication stops half way through the semester.
  • This is a relaxed online class!

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • If you complete all the lecture notes, she gives you 10% extra on the final!!
  • If you do the question half way right, you'll get half of the points.
  • Overall the class is easy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across online and in-person from 2012-2019 provide rich format contrast and consistent themes.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1265 reviews
MATH1314 reviews
MATH303 reviews
MATH643 reviews
12041 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH1101 review
MATH1121 review
MATH64041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values