AI Rate Professor

Music

Deborah Reeves

MTEC110 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid unless you specifically want studio setup and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStudio-focused music techLecture heavyBoring for someLikable personalityLimited subject depth
  • MTEC110 is studio recording and soundboard focused, not home songwriting.
  • Students find lectures boring and .
  • Neither reviewer would take her again despite finding her likable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Difficulty ratings are low, but one reported grade was C+ and neither student .

All evidence is In person; no Online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Content difficulty is modest, but boredom and book-based lectures hurt engagement more than rigor.

All evidence is In person; no Online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; another tags skip-class-you-wont-pass.

All evidence is In person; no Online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Both students would not take her again due to boring delivery and weak insight.

All evidence is In person; no Online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

No strong lenient or ; one known grade is C+.

Format shift

Based only on In person reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

; friction is teaching style more than volume.

Format shift

Based only on In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Likable and jokey, but lectures called boring with and weak answers.

Format shift

Based only on In person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Studio practice and lecture content dominate; exams are not clearly described.

Format shift

Based only on In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and often dull, with limited insight beyond the book.

Main concern

Class content and teaching depth mismatch student hopes for modern home songwriting.

What students said

“This class was so boring people were sleeping in class.”
MTEC110
“this class was very studio taught. how to set up a studio, record in the studio, and use the soundboard for mixing.”
MTEC110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was so boring people were sleeping in class. Her way of teaching was questionable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 In person reviews on studio focus and weak lecture value. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“The the book. Other than that, she didn't provide much insight.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“No”

🎛️ Course Focus

55/100

“this class was very studio taught. how to set up a studio, record in the studio, and use the soundboard for mixing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This class was so boring people were sleeping in class.
  • Deborah was a likable teacher, always made jokes and interesting topics.
  • she didn't always have answers to questions students asked

Theme 2

🎵 About Course Content

  • this class was very studio taught
  • The class was a bit different than what i had hoped
  • She's more experienced in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two 2019 In person reviews on one course, consistent negativity but tiny sample.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MTEC1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values