AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Joyce Johnson

MATH64 · MATH101 · MATH20 · MATH30 · MATH830 · MATH126 · MATH125 · MATH100 · ALEGBRA100 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and can teach yourself math without classroom support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderDoes Not TeachSelf Teach RequiredHeavy TestsUnhelpful
  • Recent reviews say she barely teaches and .
  • and are graded very hard with little partial credit.
  • Older reviews are mixed, but and frustration is consistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even , and little partial credit so an A demands heavy self-study.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and tests add material beyond lectures and the textbook.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some sections mark attendance optional, others mandatory, with little consistent policy detail.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and most students call her among the .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and little partial credit define grading.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of create a heavy load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

and students teaching themselves while she sits at her desk.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and often feel disconnected from homework and lecture examples.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math sections are widely described as , and hard, sometimes unrelated tests.

Main concern

, and tests with material never covered make passing stressful.

What students said

“She has you teach the material yourself and then puts things on the .”
MATH126
“Awful, awful teacher. lot of homework.”
MATH64
“She has NO clue what she is doing. She constantly makes mistakes on the board that confuses the class.”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes, tightly timed, and often include problems students say were never taught.

Hard Timed TestsUncovered MaterialLittle Partial CreditHigh Weight Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as tough, sometimes unrelated to class, and graded with little mercy.

Hard Timed TestsUncovered MaterialLittle Partial Credit
“ and she is a .”
MATH126
“Gives no partial credit (only all or nothing).”
MATH100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Definitely the least competent teacher I have ever had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 in-person reviews across many years, emphasizing teaching failure and harsh exams. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

24/100

“She has NO clue what she is doing. She constantly makes mistakes on the board that confuses the class.”

📉 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ if u want to pass”

⚖️

18/100

“Gives no partial credit (only all or nothing).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she sits at her desk while students are expected to teach each other
  • doesn't show her work, doesn't go over the homework
  • She said, I probably could, but I won't.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • she is a
  • your grade

Theme 3

😤 About Classroom Climate

  • most of the time scoffs when they ask for help
  • students are unteachable and make her burnt out
  • Discourged me from math period

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews over many years with detailed, consistent complaints about teaching and .

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 57
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH1006 reviews
MATH1016 reviews
MATH644 reviews
MATH1263 reviews
ALEGBRA1001 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH1251 review
MATH201 review
MATH301 review
MATH8301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 2 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values