AI Rate Professor

Work Experience

Lee Hermann

WKEK233 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

, but if you need a light class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFlexible In PersonTough Online GraderWork GoalsHeavy Essays OnlineMixed Formats
  • Only two reviews exist and they disagree sharply by format.
  • , and light.
  • Online section was called a time sink with perfect-essay standards.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

In-person load looks light, but the and perfect essays with no easy-A language.

Online evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

In-person difficulty rated very low, while online felt hard and .

In-person felt easy; online felt hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Attendance policy is not clearly stated; in-person tone is flexible while .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; the online student urges others to pick a different class.

In-person recommends; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Online student labels a ; in-person review does not counter that.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

In-person work goals feel light, but .

Format shift

Online workload complaints dominate the blended score.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

a 1/5 online quality rating and frustration.

Format shift

In-person quality 4 versus online quality 1.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Both reviews center writing tasks such as work goals and multiple essays rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One in-person review describes a helpful, understanding, flexible professor with useful work-goal writing.

Main concern

Single-review sample size only.

What students said

“Helpful, understanding and flexible professir”
WKEK233

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One online review calls the class time-heavy with and a .

Main concern

and high time cost while working.

What students said

“this class took up way to much time with me working and going to school”
2144

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize written assignments and .

Multiple EssaysWork Goals Writing

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and does not describe exams.

Work Goals Writing
“Had to write work goals which I was not expecting”
WKEK233

Online

Online review focuses on multiple perfect essays and .

Multiple EssaysTough Grader
“You and they have to be PERFECT”
2144

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Helpful, understanding and flexible professir. Had to write work goals which I was not expecting but it is a college class and goals really helped me at my work”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in-person) with conflicting tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Helpful, understanding and flexible professir”

📝 Online Workload

30/100

“this class took up way to much time with me working and going to school”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“ ”

Theme 1

🏫

  • Helpful, understanding and flexible professir
  • goals really helped me at my work

Theme 2

💻 About Online Experience

  • this class took up way to much time
  • This teacher is a
  • You and they have to be PERFECT

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting format reviews with no grades listed leave low confidence in any blended score.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

21441 review
WKEK2331 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values