AI Rate Professor

English

Amy Bolaski

LIT120 · LIT101 · AMIBOLASKI · ENGLI100 · ENG37 · ENGL201 · ENGL100 · ENG201 · ENGLISH201 · ENG202 · ENGLISH102 · ENG100 · COMM202 · 58 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if and will revise hard; skip her if you need polished lectures and tight organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnlimited essay revisionsDetailed paper feedbackMonotone lecturesSometimes unorganizedExtra credit opportunities
  • Students split between loving her revision policy and writing growth versus finding lectures dry, boring, and .
  • Unlimited revisions, strong feedback, and give motivated writers a .
  • Class cancellations, slow emails, and disorganization are the most repeated complaints, especially in some terms.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Unlimited revisions and help, but many say getting an A still takes serious writing effort.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Writing and a light blow-off.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

62/100

as strictly enforced; some terms had frequent cancellations.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Strong for and revisions; weak for students who need organized, energetic lectures.

All analyzed evidence is from in-person reviews; and mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Tough first grades are offset by unlimited revisions, effort-based improvement, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Essays, blogs, workshops, and some heavy summer loads create a steady writing workload.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and passion for writing clash with dry lectures and organization issues.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and microthemes rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English and literature courses , and revisions; many praise growth while others call lectures boring and the .

Main concern

Frequent notes of cancelled classes, monotone delivery, and .

What students said

“Unbelievably BORING and monotone, was late to class pretty much everyday of the first week.”
ENG100
“She .”
ENGL100
“she is hard,but she gives and time to improve your essays.”
ENG201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper-driven with revisions; quizzes appear in some literature sections but .

Essay-heavyUnlimited revisionsSome reader-response quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some courses add weekly quizzes or blogs.

Essay portfolioUnlimited revisionsWeekly quizzes in some lit courses
“She .”
ENGL100
“The though, so you'd better study for them.”
LIT120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She .Critiquing others work was 70% of the class time. Just show up and revise your work and you'll do really well”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting feedback strength versus organization and lecture complaints. Credibility rating: High.

📝

75/100

“ ! You can only fail her class if you dont try at all.”

😴 Lecture Style

35/100

“Unbelievably BORING and monotone, was late to class pretty much everyday of the first week.”

📂 Organization Issues

40/100

“she was absent 70% of the semester , did not learn a thing”

👍

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a very unique style that really works
  • lectures are very boring and she is not good about emailing students back
  • monotoned but cool

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Be prepared it is hard overall just to get an A
  • She grades on the amount of effort and gradual improvement
  • gives many opportunities

Theme 3

🗂️ About Organization

  • and her lectures are admittedly dry
  • cancels class a lot
  • doesn't keep up with gradebook

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

58

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years show a and organization complaints, supporting high credibility.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 58
3 out of 56
2 out of 58
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG10011 reviews
ENG20110 reviews
ENGL2018 reviews
ENGL1006 reviews
LIT1204 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ENGLISH1022 reviews
ENGLISH2012 reviews
2011 review
AMIBOLASKI1 review
COMM2021 review
ENG2021 review
ENG371 review
ENGLI1001 review
LIT1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1