AI Rate Professor

English

Katie Montagna

HUMN101 · ENG201 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you like a caring English professor and and writing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGenuine and caringHeavy reading loadFlexible due datesParticipation-focusedWriting-heavy
  • Students praise her genuine care, dry humor, and willingness to help.
  • Expect and lots of writing with few formal tests.
  • Flexible on deadlines and easy to pass if you complete the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students report easy to pass with flexible deadlines and A grades when work is completed.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is approachable but and writing load is steady.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and participation is emphasized.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

and calls her a great flexible professor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Easy to pass with flexible deadlines and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and multiple writing assignments keep the load steady.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students call her genuine, funny, flexible, and deeply caring about English.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and essays more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person classes mix ENG201 and HUMN101 with , and a warm flexible instructor.

Main concern

and pop quizzes can catch unprepared students.

What students said

“She's very flexible, with multiple due dates getting pushed back and she's always willing to help out students in need.”
ENG201
“Her class was easy to pass but the and took long to do.”
ENG201
“Chapter reading and week.”
HUMN101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on quizzes and writing; .

Pop quizzesWriting-focusedFew formal tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Pop quizzes and writing dominate; one ENG201 section had no tests for credit.

Pop quizzesNo tests for creditWeekly quizzes
“ but lots of writing.”
ENG201
“Chapter reading and week.”
HUMN101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“10/10 great professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person , and flexibility. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“She's a real genuine teacher and cares deeply about English.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“10/10 great professor.”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“Her class was easy to pass but the and took long to do.”

📝 Easy A Path

82/100

“She's very flexible, with multiple due dates getting pushed back and she's always willing to help out students in need.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a real genuine teacher and cares deeply about English.
  • and is pretty funny.
  • She's super quirky and cares deeply about what she teaches.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Her class was easy to pass but the .
  • Expect to read 3 novels + 1 research assignment.
  • but lots of writing.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's very flexible... always willing to help out students in need.
  • and can be funny.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed in-person reviews from 2016-2017 are consistent but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG2013 reviews
HUMN1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values