AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Ngo Tran

CS150 · CS112 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid if you need hand-holding in intro programming; if you already code and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProThick AccentTeaches From the BookMixed Student SupportHarsh on QuestionsEasy If You Already Code
  • and hilarious versus rude, unhelpful, and mocking of questions.
  • ; progress checks and in-class support are limited.
  • Students who already know how to code tend to pass more easily than true beginners.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some report A grades and easy material if you already code, but weak support makes an A harder for beginners who get stuck.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Difficulty ratings sit around mid-to-high; course is manageable for coders and challenging for true intro students.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Attendance is mandatory in some reviews and not in others, with .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

, but detailed comments include strong do-not-take warnings for beginners.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, yet point structure is thin and students still report struggling without support.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Limited detail on homework volume; main pain is labs not matching .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Split between amazing lectures and , and rude answers to questions.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments stress labs and few total points with .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Small set of and strong criticism of accent, help quality, and .

Main concern

Beginners may get lost without help, and some report being mocked for questions.

What students said

“I would not take a class with Professor Tran again. He has a very thick accent. He also teaches directly from the book in lecture, but the .”
CS150
“If you get lost at all, don't expect any help. He openly mocks students who ask questions.”
CS112
“ and easy. The material is also fun to learn. If you know how to code you will be fine and pass :)”
CS150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe proctored exams; assessment risk centers on labs and sparse progress checks.

Lab FocusedFew CheckpointsExtra Credit Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; labs and limited checkpoints dominate concerns.

LabsNo Quizzes for Progress
“No in .”
CS112
“He also teaches directly from the book in lecture, but the .”
CS150

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you get lost at all, don't expect any help. He openly mocks students who ask questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews with low sample size. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Consistency

50/100

“This Professor is awesome!”

⚠️ Help Quality

30/100

“ and he's rude answering questions.”

🧑‍💻 Who Succeeds

55/100

“If you know how to code you will be fine and pass :)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Tran was care about his Students.
  • He also teaches directly from the book in lecture.
  • Amazing lectures

Theme 2

⚠️ About Support and Tone

  • He openly mocks students who ask questions.
  • he's rude answering questions.
  • If you do not know how .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only five short reviews with mixed polarity and limited grade detail make conclusions fragile.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CS1503 reviews
CS1122 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values