AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Jennifer Paris

CHLD112 · CHLD111 · CHILD105 · CHLD105 · CHLDCHLD · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Skip if possible unless you can handle heavy weekly writing and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy WorkloadBusy WorkTough GraderOpinionated FeedbackAmbiguous Tests
  • Most students , and busy work.
  • stated a preference.
  • A minority praise organization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Some students still earn As, but , and stress, so the A is costly.

Online reviews stress overload; and papers.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Content plus constant weekly projects and .

Both formats report heavy weekly work; online comments emphasize stress more.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as mandatory, but many reviews focus on weekly online-style work rather than seat time.

online comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

, and the dominant student advice is not to enroll.

Both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report , and deductions when answers do not match her preferred view.

Format shift

Online reviews highlight inflexible point-taking; .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Repeated comments about lots of homework, so many papers, and .

Format shift

Both formats complain about volume; online students especially report everything piling up.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

A few students praise organization and understanding, but .

Format shift

; online reviews are mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Weekly chapter questions, discussion posts, papers, projects, and focus.

Format shift

In-person CHLD111 describes weekly multi-part assignment stacks; online also piles quizzes and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and understanding, while many cite piles of , and rude opinion grading.

Main concern

.

What students said

“ ! Worst professor I've ever had.”
CHLD112
“Not a good instructor takes forever to grade and pays more attention to personal life”
CHILD105
“She is a very understanding teacher. SHe understands and gives you a brake if u talk to her”
CHLD105

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews , and high stress despite one A grade.

Main concern

Too many projects, quizzes, and .

What students said

“horrible! ! shes not inspirational and does not love her job.”
105
“ and exams all at once.”
CHLD112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes exist, but students mainly struggle with and constant stacked assessments.

Weekly QuizzesAmbiguous Test WordingMultiple Choice Chapter TestsHeavy Projects

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as ambiguously worded, with heavy weekly papers and projects around them.

Ambiguous Test WordingMultiple Choice Chapter TestsLots of Papers
“My big problem is that the questions on her tests are ambiguous, worded in a .”
CHLD105
“learning ”
CHLD111

Online

Online students report quizzes and exams stacked with projects and .

Quizzes and Exams StackedConfusing Assignments
“ and exams all at once”
CHLD112
“if it is not answered the way she wants it she will not like it and ”
105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Worst professor I've ever had. She is very opinionated and in weekly blogs if your opinion is different then hers she is very rude”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (2 online, 7 in person), weighting repeated workload and . Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Overload

18/100

“LOTS & LOTS OF .”

👎 Recommendation

24/100

“horrible! !”

📝

28/100

“grades on opinions not quality of work”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • so much work, and

Theme 2

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • takes forever to grade and pays more attention to personal life
  • incredibly organized, with

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across 2011-2016 with both formats, repeated workload complaints, and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHILD1052 reviews
CHLD1052 reviews
CHLD1122 reviews
1051 review
CHLD1111 review
Show 1 more courses
CHLDCHLD1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values