AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Alaganadan Nanthakumar

CHEM110 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

; students say he cannot teach the material and grades slowly with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProWorst teacherBad at explainingSlow gradingNever take again
  • Both reviews rate teaching quality at 1/5 and .
  • He is described as bad at explaining material and slow to grade with .
  • One student still earned an A but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student got an A despite calling him the , so grades may be possible, but and unclear.

All evidence is from in-person CHEM110 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty ratings sit around 3-4 and comments focus on bad teaching rather than easy content.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and another says it was, so policy is inconsistent.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students explicitly say never take him and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

An A was reported, but students say and the method does not make sense.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

and poor teaching more than assignment volume.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Both reviews hammer him for and not caring about students.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize submitted assignments and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both in-person CHEM110 reviews are strongly negative, , and .

Main concern

Poor teaching and experience even if you can scrape a grade.

What students said

“ . . I repeat never.”
CHEM110
“This teacher sucks at explaining the material. He takes and doesn't really care about his students.”
CHEM110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

“ ”
CHEM110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . . I repeat never.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews spanning 2015-2016, highlighting poor teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

8/100

“He is so bad at teaching the material and takes forever to grade things”

👎 Recommendation

5/100

“ !”

⏱️

15/100

“He takes and doesn't really care about his students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . . I repeat never.
  • This teacher sucks at explaining the material.

Theme 2

📝

  • takes forever to grade things and
  • doesn't really care about his students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews from 2015-2016, both strongly negative and consistent, but the sample is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1