AI Rate Professor

English

Jason Perez

ENGL100 · ENG201 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you want a social-issues discussion class rather than structured English writing help.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnorganizedSocial issues focusNot real EnglishAwkward classAvoid
  • Students say the class is more social issues and cultural commentary than practical English writing.
  • He is described as unorganized and .
  • English skills often do not improve, and none of the reviewers want him again.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Deadlines can be flexible and one English major did well, but classmates struggled and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty sits mid-range; the pain is misaligned content and confusion more than pure intellectual intensity.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and one says no, so policy is mixed.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students say avoid if , and feel writing skills did not improve.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Papers get extra time past deadlines, but .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Writing papers and social-topic work are required, but volume is not framed as overwhelming.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students call him unorganized, awkward, and weak at teaching practical English.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on papers rather than in-class essays, with .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ENG201 and ENGL100 reviews , and heavy social-topic focus.

Main concern

You may not improve writing skills, and expectations for .

What students said

“This class isn't much of an English class due to the minuscule amount of English the professor teaches.”
ENG201
“ if possible! The professor always seems so unorganized and unsure of what he wants .”
ENGL100
“I wasn't able to improve my writing skills in this class, it definitely didn't feel like an entry level English class.”
ENGL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and deadlines rather than traditional exams, and .

Paper-focused

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and do not clearly describe exam format.

PapersFlexible deadlinesNo in-class essays mentioned
“We didn't write any in class essays and we are always given time past the deadline for our papers.”
ENGL100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if possible! The professor always seems so unorganized and unsure of what he wants .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person English reviews, highlighting content mismatch and weak writing instruction. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

22/100

“This class isn't much of an English class due to the minuscule amount of English the professor teaches.”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“ .”

📚 Course Focus

25/100

“The class is mainly about social issues and different cultural studies from the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • unorganized and unsure of what he wants .
  • Very awkward classroom experience.

Theme 2

📈 About Course Content

  • You will learn primarily about hip-hop and feminism
  • I wasn't able to improve my writing skills in this class
  • my English skills have not improved.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from 2015-2016, but they are detailed and consistently critical of teaching focus and organization.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL1002 reviews
ENG2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values