AI Rate Professor

Art

Amanda Quintenz-Fiedler

ART253 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Solid pick for ART253 if you like collaborative work and , but expect large-class limits on studio time.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGroup projectsClear grading criteriaGood feedbackLarge-class strugglesIndustry-style collab
  • and if you meet stated expectations.
  • .
  • Large classes can cut studio time and force syllabus changes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Both reported A or A+ when criteria were met, with and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty sits mid-range with industry collab work rather than pure conceptual overload.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

as mandatory and another as not required, so policy is inconsistent.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, and learning, tempered by large-class and syllabus issues.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Clear criteria and reported A/A+ rubric.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Group projects drive the load .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Strong craft knowledge and and syllabus changes.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Assessment centers on group projects and meeting stated criteria rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ART253 mixes clear criteria and industry-style group work with personality praise, though large sections reduce studio time and invite syllabus churn.

Main concern

Large enrollment can limit hands-on studio time and invite interruptions.

What students said

“She outlines criteria and as long as that's met, you're in good shape.”
ART253
“because the class was so large we didn't get much studio time.”
ART253

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize group projects and rubrics more than formal exams, so .

Project-based assessmentClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; grading hinges on group projects and criteria.

Group projectsClear grading criteria
“The class requires a lot of the industry workplace.”
ART253

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She outlines criteria and as long as that's met, you're in good shape. She has a great personality and would love to learn more from her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews spanning 2016-2025, highlighting collab work and large-class limits. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Very good teacher that knows her craft, can't handle large classes and allowed her past students to always interrupt her current class.”

📋

78/100

“She outlines criteria and as long as that's met, you're in good shape.”

🤝 Collaboration Focus

72/100

“The class requires a lot of the industry workplace.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a great personality and would love to learn more from her.
  • Very good teacher that knows her craft
  • I felt like I learned a lot in her class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She outlines criteria and as long as that's met, you're in good shape.
  • Had to make changes to the syllabus several times.

Theme 3

🏫 About Class Size

  • can't handle large classes
  • because the class was so large we didn't get much studio time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews spanning 2016 and 2025 with mixed detail and limited grade breadth.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART2532 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values