AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Zahra Salehpoor

MATH08 · MATH125 · MATH101 · MATH103 · MATH30 · ALB830 · MATH116 · MATH38 · MATH830 · STATISTIC · MATH135 · MATH130 · MNS205 · ALGEALGE · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can follow a non-native accent and will attend and practice; skip if you need slow, easy-to-parse lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear examples in classAccent can block learningTests harder than homeworkHelpful when you connectFast pace
  • and math breakthroughs; a vocal minority cannot understand the accent or pace.
  • , so practice and attendance matter.
  • Lower-level math can feel easy if you show up and work problems; weak background students struggle more.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A is reachable with , and notes on tests for many, but and some students fail or drop.

Almost all grade evidence is in person; the one online review reported a B- with high difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Content is often basic math or stats, but fast pace and abstract delivery make it feel hard without practice.

Online review stressed needing Algebra already; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple reviews say attendance is mandatory or that missing class means missing a lot of material.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Strong praise for clarity and , and unfair-feeling tests.

In-person recommendations dominate; the sole online review was lukewarm.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Some report notes on tests, dropped lowest score, and decent grades with moderate work; .

Format shift

and math reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

lots of HW due on exam days; not usually overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload comments are almost entirely in person.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Many students say she makes math click with ; , and hard to understand.

Format shift

In person is mixed-positive; the online comment emphasized articulation problems.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Homework and quizzes support learning, but and often feel harder than classwork.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many call her clear and the ; , and tougher-than-homework tests.

Main concern

Accent, fast pace, and .

What students said

“ , and she has a way of teaching that drives the .”
MATH30
“You can and .”
MATH103
“her tests- they're way more difficult than either her lectures or the .”
126

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review found her without strong prior Algebra and rated quality low.

Main concern

.

What students said

“She is a decent professor but has a hard time articulating what she is teaching.”
MNS205

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard difficulty with occasional student-friendly policies like notes and dropped scores, but .

Notes allowed on some testsDrops lowest testTests harder than homeworkHandwritten chapter tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Some sections allow notes and ; several students say tests are harder than lectures or homework.

Notes on testsDrop lowest testHarder than homework
“You can and .”
MATH103
“Her tests aren't that easy but if you do all the will succeed.”
135
“her tests- they're way more difficult than either her lectures or the .”
126

Online

.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I am not a math person, never have been, but she has a way of teaching math that I really get. She's probably the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews (1 online, 41 in person), highlighting clarity, accent, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

68/100

“She gives lots of example at class instead of just teaching and passing the subjects. I think she speaks so clearly.”

🗣️ Accent Barrier

40/100

“Her accent gets in the way of everything. I cannot understand her and she talks waaaaaaay too fast.”

📝

55/100

“her tests- they're way more difficult than either her lectures or the .”

👍 Recommendation Split

66/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she has a way of teaching that drives the
  • She teaches the concepts in a very basic manner
  • but lifeless in lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class itself is so easy I could do it in my sleep
  • if you do all the

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she is really perfect and nice and very helpful
  • she likes her students and
  • awesome teacher. She doesn't make you feel stupid

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

42 reviews spanning 2008-2016 with detailed comments and consistent mixed themes on accent, clarity, and .

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 56
3 out of 57
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH10315 reviews
MATH8306 reviews
MATH385 reviews
STATISTIC3 reviews
MATH1012 reviews
Show 11 more courses
1261 review
1351 review
ALB8301 review
ALGEALGE1 review
MATH081 review
MATH1161 review
MATH1251 review
MATH1301 review
MATH1351 review
MATH301 review
MNS2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 4 · A 4

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Fail 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1