AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Terrie Nichols

MATH126 · PRECALCULUS · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Do not take her math class if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedNo Real HelpEndless HomeworkTeaching MistakesNot Recommended
  • All four reviews rate teaching quality at 1-2 and urge avoidance.
  • , and poorly aligned with lectures.
  • Students say she confuses material, ignores questions, and grades rudely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Heavy poorly aligned homework and and uncertain.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content difficulty is high and self-teaching is forced because lectures and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory with no indication of flexibility.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and argues she should not teach math.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students call her a and still expects mastery of untaught material.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

as super lengthy with many textbook problems and labs that are not taught.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviews focus on mistakes while teaching, unfinished worksheets, and ignoring student questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Workload and worksheets rather than well-explained exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person precalculus and MATH126 sections are described as , and unsupportive.

Main concern

and little help when students ask.

What students said

“One of the i asked her multiple times, and her homework was super lengthy”
MATH126
“For being a math teacher she makes far too many mistakes when teaching.”
PRECALCULUS
“A be a math teacher.”
MATH126

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews and mainly discuss homework and worksheets.

Textbook homeworkWorksheet labs

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and unfinished worksheet teaching rather than exam software.

Textbook homeworkWorksheet-based labs
“ , but that's the only time she uses it.”
126
“most math work is done in groups by the use of worksheets and not the book.”
MATH126

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the i asked her multiple times, and her homework was super lengthy and we never even went over it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting disorganization and lack of help. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“ .”

🌪️ Teaching Quality

12/100

“For being a math teacher she makes far too many mistakes when teaching.”

📚 Workload Pain

22/100

“ and we never even went over it.”

🙋 No Help

15/100

“she never ever helped when i asked her multiple times”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she makes far too many mistakes when teaching
  • unorganized teacher
  • Confuses math and does not teach it appropriately

Theme 2

📝

  • and we never even went over it
  • only collects 1 out of the 6 assignments

Theme 3

💔 About Support

  • never ever helped when i asked her multiple times
  • disregards questions that the class makes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four older reviews exist, all negative and consistent, but the sample is too small and dated for high confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1262 reviews
1261 review
PRECALCULUS1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1