AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Solomon Gabbay

CHEM110 · CHEM104 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want to learn chemistry; only consider if you can teach yourself and just need a grade.

Best fit · Easy A HunterReads From SlidesEasy Grade Easy Fail LearningFrequent MistakesHard To UnderstandSelf-Study Required
  • Teaching quality is widely panned even when grades come out fine.
  • Lectures track the book or PowerPoint and often include mistakes.
  • An A , but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Students say , and an A is realistic if you study the book yourself.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content can be manageable with prior chem knowledge, but first-timers struggle without usable lectures.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

and whole classes skipped lectures to study elsewhere without losing the grade path.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

is better for actual learning.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

84/100

and labs not scrutinized, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

and labs; the real work is self-reading the textbook for tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Frequent teaching mistakes, monotone delivery, and inability to answer questions dominate reviews.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests from the book and labs.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

as slide-reading and error-prone, with students often learning alone yet still able to pass.

Main concern

You may get the grade without learning the chemistry.

What students said

“ . I promise you if you because of your schedule no, just no.”
CHEM110
“You WILL get an A, but you WILL not understand the material.”
110
“ and makes frequent mistakes when teaching.”
CHEM110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are multiple choice and drawn from the book, which is friendlier than strict closed-book proctoring.

Multiple choiceTests from the bookLow homework pressure

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

book and are multiple choice with little homework collection.

Multiple choiceBook-based testsHomework often uncollected
“ and are multiple choice.”
CHEM110
“ and didn't care what your labs looked like.”
CHEM110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You WILL get an A, but you WILL not understand the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting weak lectures with . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Easy Grade Trap

80/100

“You WILL get an A, but you WILL not understand the material.”

📚 Teaching Quality

24/100

“His lectures are straight from the book. He can't always answer your questions and often makes mistakes while teaching.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ANY other chem professor would be better.”

📝 Assessment Style

78/100

“ and are multiple choice.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He reads off the
  • makes frequent mistakes when teaching
  • Accent makes him very hard to understand

Theme 2

📈 About Grades Vs Learning

  • You WILL get an A, but you WILL not understand the material.
  • the and study in the library
  • he is not a hard teacher.

Theme 3

🧪 About Course Work

  • and didn't care what your labs looked like.
  • and are multiple choice.
  • To pass this class, it is required that you reread every section yourself.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across several years are consistent about weak teaching and , but the sample is small and aging.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM1104 reviews
1101 review
CHEM1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1