AI Rate Professor

Communication

Naomi Young

COMM212 · COMM106 · COMM101 · COMM137 · GROUPCOMM · COMM207 · COM201 · INTER201 · COM101 · COMM206 · COMM100 · COMM201 · COM207 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if and thrive in group-driven, low-structure classes.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedVague ExpectationsGroup-Work HeavyPolarizingDislikes Email
  • Later reviews slam her as , and .
  • Classes lean on student group teaching, movies, and .
  • Older reviews praise her as fun and caring, so experiences are highly polarized by era.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Content and group work can be easy, but confusion and and self-tracking.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Course content is often described as easy or fun, but disorganization raises the effective difficulty.

All evidence is in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All evidence is in person; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

A large share of , and lack of help.

All reviews are in person; older positive reviews conflict with later harsh ones.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some call her an easy or ; and inaccurate grades.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Lots of group work, speeches, and assignments; load is real but rarely described as overwhelming.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

, and poor communication, despite some glowing older reviews.

Format shift

All evidence is in person across many years.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Group projects, speeches, worksheets, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and the , while earlier students found her fun, fair, and great for public speaking.

Main concern

, and poor email response leave students guessing.

What students said

“One of the . She personally attacks people and .”
COMM100
“she is so disorganized and ”
COMM106
“She is a and her specific expectations.”
COMM101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments mix midterms, speeches, and group work; .

MidtermsSpeechesGroup WorkNo Curve Sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; speeches and group work also count heavily.

Hard MidtermsNo CurveSpeechesGroup Projects
“the average grade on the midterm was a 68%, the highest grade was an 82%, she is not curving it”
COMM106
“highest grade on the and because she didnt know how!!”
COMM106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Seriously the . . She is vague and constantly takes the easier route for her regardless of how it effects the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 in-person reviews, highlighting disorganization, group work, and polarized character. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation

34/100

“ . She is vague and constantly takes the easier route for her regardless of how it effects the class.”

📂 Disorganization

36/100

“she is so disorganized and ”

📧 Unresponsive

30/100

“She never answers E-Mails which are important because you are not allowed to ask questions during class.”

❤️ Positive Outlier

70/100

“Such a wonderful lady!!!! Nothing but good times in her class.. I really learned a lot her lessons are amazing!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she doesn't even enjoy teaching yet alone have the slightest clue what she is teaching
  • basically you teach the class while she pretends to know what she's talking about
  • she doesn't really teach the material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class was fairly easy, but you have to do the work
  • easy grade if you're carrying a full load
  • the average grade on the midterm was a 68%

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very friendly, funny, and helpful lady
  • she is a nice lady and tries to make the class easy AND fun
  • she personally attacks people and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-nine in-person reviews over many years with consistent disorganization themes and enough positive outliers to show polarization.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 56
2 out of 54
1 out of 515

Course coverage

COMM10111 reviews
COMM10610 reviews
COMM2077 reviews
COMM1002 reviews
COM1011 review
Show 8 more courses
COM2011 review
COM2071 review
COMM1371 review
COMM2011 review
COMM2061 review
COMM2121 review
GROUPCOMM1 review
INTER2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values