AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Carmella Byrnes

CHEM110 · CHEM108 · PHSN106 · CHEM111 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Better bet in person or if you can self-navigate; online sections draw sharp complaints about silence and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of HomeworkEmail Hit-or-MissFair TestsOnline PolarizingHelpful When Engaged
  • In-person and earlier , and real support.
  • Online , and missing study guides.
  • ; students who put in the time usually say the work prepares them for exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is reachable with and study, not by coasting; .

Online students report harder struggle; in-person students more often call outcomes fair with effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Introductory chemistry with lots of memorization and homework; content is standard but not light.

Online reviews rate difficulty higher; in-person reviews more mixed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; online students frequently say avoid.

; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

available, though multiple-choice can be tricky.

Format shift

Fairness comments are stronger in person; online focus is on mismatched tests.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Nearly every detailed review mentions a lot of homework as required to learn the material.

Format shift

and in-person formats.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and supports students; online delivery draws sharp teaching complaints.

Format shift

Online teaching is .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Substantial homework plus several exams; .

Format shift

One review notes three exams taken in person even for an online-style section.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and hybrid-style comments more often call her a and homework that prepares you well.

Main concern

and occasional scattered lecture structure.

What students said

“Dr. Byrnes is a great professor and cares a lot about her students. and .”
CHEM111
“Yes she does give a lot of homework, but it really helps! !”
CHEM108
“Lots of , not to forget also lots of homework.”
CHEM108

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CHEM108 feedback is mostly negative: unresponsive emails, poorly formatted lectures, no study guides, and .

Main concern

Unresponsive communication and lectures that .

What students said

“This teacher didn't respond to emails, didn't answer specific questions ”
CHEM108
“she doesn't have any type of ”
CHEM108
“riddled with formatting errors, lack context, are irrelevant to the tests”
CHEM108

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally standard difficulty; some allow limited notes, and .

In-Person ExamsSome Notes AllowedTricky Multiple ChoiceNo Study Guide Sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews call tests fair; some online-style .

Fair TestsSome Notes AllowedIn-Person Exams
“Tests are fair and .”
CHEM111
“3 exams were taken in person. She did allow some notes going in to test.”
CHEM108

Online

Online students report no study guides, oddly worded questions, and lectures that do not match tests.

No Study GuideOddly Worded QuestionsLectures Mismatch Tests
“oddly worded, sometimes they're just statements, don't follow the same format as the homework”
CHEM108
“she doesn't have any type of ”
CHEM108

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Byrnes is a great professor and cares a lot about her students. She knows the material well and if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (4 online, 7 in person), highlighting format split and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📧 Online Communication

30/100

“This teacher didn't respond to emails, didn't answer specific questions ”

📚

32/100

“Yes she does give a lot of homework, but it really helps!”

👍 In-Person Teaching

70/100

“Dr. Byrnes is a great professor and cares a lot about her students.”

📝

40/100

“she doesn't have any type of . Instead she gives you tons of useless information”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she didn't TEACH me anything
  • Great support & she promptly answers emails
  • if

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of , not to forget also lots of homework
  • Multiple choice questions are tricky
  • and

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • This is by far the
  • riddled with formatting errors
  • The one and only class I have EVER dropped

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews from 2007-2014 with ; sample is modest but detailed.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM1087 reviews
CHEM1112 reviews
CHEM1101 review
PHSN1061 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1