AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Albert Watson

CS111 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other option and are ready for a very hard CS class with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery HardLow QualitySparse Feedback
  • Only one review exists and it rates quality at the bottom.
  • Course difficulty is described as hard with no positive counterpoints.
  • There is almost no .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

The only review pairs bottom quality with maximum difficulty and gives no path to an easy A.

All evidence comes from one in-person CS111 review.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Difficulty is rated 5 and the sole student comment is simply hard.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

No online reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

A quality score of 1 with no redeeming detail strongly signals against taking the class.

Recommendation is inferred only from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

, and the overall experience is framed as hard and low quality.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The review does not list assignments, but max difficulty implies a heavy lift.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Quality is rated 1 with no positive teaching comments.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not describe whether .

Format shift

In-person only evidence; assessment mix is unknown.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One sparse in-person CS111 review calls the class hard and rates quality at 1.

Main concern

Extremely limited evidence and a single negative hard label.

What students said

“hard”
CS111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

review.

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam policy for CS111.

“hard”
CS111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“hard”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 sparse in-person review with minimal detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“hard”

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

10/100

“hard”

👎 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“hard”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • hard

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hard

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

A single one-word 2014 review provides almost no detail, consistency, or recent confirmation.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CS1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values