AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Becky Stephens

MATH64 · MATH30 · MATH150 · MATH135 · MATH260 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCondescendingConfusing LecturesUnorganizedHarsh PresenceSelf-Study Required
  • Many students call her rude, condescending, and the .
  • and mismatched assignments vs exams.
  • A few students cope if they already know algebra well or can learn from the book alone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A usually means self-teaching , and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content and pace feel hard for many because examples are weak and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews rarely state a , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students strongly and poor teaching.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

scores common and little patience for slackers.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is medium with , and heavy finals rather than endless daily busywork.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Students repeatedly describe , condescension, and disorganization, with only rare positive notes.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

, and overloaded finals more than guided practice.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math classes often feel poorly explained, condescending, and .

Main concern

Rude tone, weak lecture examples, and .

What students said

“She was the !! I ended up dropping the class because of my negative experience.”
MATH30
“She is the ! Turn around and run.”
MATH135
“If you are not a IF POSSIBLE!”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often feel strict, cumulative, and time-crunched, with limited lecture prep and occasional grade-boost options.

Cumulative ExamsOverloaded FinalsNo Book In ClassFair Curve Options Rare

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

finish, and some students say exams are tough or poorly aligned with classwork.

Over 50 Final QuestionsCumulative QuizzesNo Book In Class
“giving you over 50 questions on the finish, which is impossible for a Calculus 3 class.”
MATH260
“Never prepared you for .”
MATH135

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the ! Turn around and run.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person , and . Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

26/100

“She is the and makes you feel stupid if you don't get it.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ !!!!”

⚖️

28/100

“ .”

📚

32/100

“I had to resort to youTube videos to learn the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Laziest teacher i have ever had.
  • Very inconsistent- one day we have do things one way, and the next she randomly changes the criteria.
  • make herself sound smart.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I was happy when i got a 54 on my test and everyone else got in the 20%'s
  • thought they were very tough.

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Tone

  • If you ask a question she is very condescending and makes you feel stupid for even asking.
  • Very rude!!
  • Made me feel like an idiot for asking a question

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen detailed in-person reviews from 2012-2013 show strong consistency on negative teaching tone and weak instruction.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH2604 reviews
MATH304 reviews
MATH1353 reviews
MATH643 reviews
MATH1501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Fail 1