AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Patricia Woody

CS · CS107 · CS111 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless you can teach yourself fully from the textbook with no help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnpreparedConfusing GraderAvoidHalf Class DroppedBook-Only Teaching
  • Nearly every review calls her unprepared and unhelpful with explanations.
  • Grading scales and .
  • Half the ; students say .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

, and late grades make earning an A feel nearly impossible even with effort.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Students rate difficulty very high and report learning mostly from the book with little classroom clarity.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every review and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report inconsistent scales, little-value , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and constant syllabus or assignment changes pile on work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

, and unhelpful answers to questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Heavy homework plus pop quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Students describe chaotic in-person CS intro classes with , and little useful lecture support.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Horrible instructor. Half the class dropped. half the time.”
CS
“ . Always changes the syllabus w/out telling.”
CS107
“She only reads powerpoint slides provided by the publisher, & it is obvious that she has not looked at the slides before.”
CS111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Pop quizzes that cannot be studied for are the clearest assessment detail; .

Pop QuizzesBook-Based Learning

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Pop quizzes appear with little study prep; .

Pop Quizzes
“Can't study for quizzes because .”
CS107

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting unprepared teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Useless. Not prepared. .”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“ .”

📉

10/100

“Half the class dropped already. !!”

⚖️

18/100

“All .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Makes us learn from the book directly
  • Any questions asked are not given a

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Can't study for quizzes because
  • A lot of hw

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • Always changes the syllabus w/out telling
  • Doesn't follow syllabus
  • consistently changes the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven consistent 2013 in-person reviews with matching complaints, but all are old and grade outcomes are sparse.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CS1074 reviews
CS1112 reviews
CS1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 2