AI Rate Professor

Health

Ric Matthews

HEAL101 · HEALTH101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

some call him solid, but expect weak communication and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSparse CommentsSlow Email ResponseGrade Error IssuesTextbook Used OnlineMixed Online Support
  • Two short online reviews call him a good instructor with B/B+ outcomes.
  • One detailed , and unresolved grade errors.
  • Difficulty ratings sit high across formats with thin overall detail.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Reported B/B+ grades with difficulty rated 4 and no claims of easy A or .

Online reviews report B/B+; the lower communication review is the only longer account.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

All three reviews rate difficulty at 4, signaling substantial content challenge.

High difficulty appears in both online and in-person-tagged reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

and in-person-tagged comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Short positive instructor notes clash with a detailed communication and .

Online comments are brief and positive; the longer complaint is more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Grades land around B/B+, but one student still had unresolved grade errors at semester end.

Format shift

Online grades look average; the .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

High difficulty ratings and deadline confusion suggest more than light effort, with little workload detail.

Format shift

Neither format spells out weekly work volume clearly.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some call him a good instructor, but support and communication quality are inconsistent.

Format shift

Online praise is one-line; the longer review is much more critical.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

No format-specific assessment breakdown is provided.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The sole in-person-tagged review actually describes an online-style experience with , and lingering grade errors.

Main concern

, and uncorrected grade mistakes.

What students said

“ via email, or to correct grading errors. There was 1 week where we had no communication from him at all.”
HEAL101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Very brief online notes label him a good instructor with mid-to-high difficulty and B/B+ grades.

Main concern

Almost no .

What students said

“Good instructor”
HEAL101
“Interesting. Good instructor”
HEALTH101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-tagged review focuses on communication and .

“At the end of the sem I still had grade errors :(”
HEAL101

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Soon I found myself struggling to figure out what was due when, and via email, or to correct grading errors.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in-person-tagged), emphasizing sparse praise versus communication problems. Credibility rating: Low.

👍 Brief Online Praise

60/100

“Good instructor”

📧 Slow Communication

25/100

“ via email, or to correct grading errors”

📉 Grade Error Risk

30/100

“At the end of the sem I still had grade errors :(”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good instructor
  • Interesting. Good instructor
  • initially he seemed very active in helping us learn

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • struggling to figure out what was due when
  • At the end of the sem I still had grade errors :(

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • via email
  • There was 1 week where we had no communication from him at all

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only three short-to-moderate reviews from 2011–2013, two of them nearly one-line, with limited consistency and detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HEAL1012 reviews
HEALTH1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values