AI Rate Professor

English

Kim Robeson

ENG205 · SDCCWRITING · ENGL100 · ENG201 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · ENG100 · ENGL202 · ENG100201 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want rigorous college-prep writing and and a polarizing personality.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing Teaching StylePicky Grammar GraderStrict AttendanceCollege Prep WritingOpinion-Heavy Classroom
  • half call her life-changing for writing skills, half call her the .
  • and can feel inconsistent with stated requirements.
  • ; missing class can cost letter grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A requires careful grammar, serious effort on papers, and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content is standard college writing and literature with real challenge for unprepared students, not a fluff course.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as and strong pressure to be present.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Fans credit transformed writing skills, while critics say she ruins English and is not open to other views.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students report , and grade penalties tied to absences.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect and , and a large end-of-semester paper.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Strong praise for help and inspiration is offset by frequent complaints about closed-mindedness and unprofessional digressions.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Assessment centers on writing assignments, presentations, and a .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and skill-building or rigid and opinion-driven, with heavy emphasis on writing, presentations, and attendance.

Main concern

and intolerance of student opinions can tank grades and morale.

What students said

“If you miss a day, you might as well leave the class because .”
ENG205
“She makes writing so much easier and more fun. She is a fun teacher with a big heart.”
SDCCWRITING
“shes extremely picky about grammer and minor errors. grammer > content”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and presentations more than formal exams, with little detail on proctoring.

Few or no quizzesLarge final paperWriting-focused assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students mainly describe writing work, presentations, and sometimes no quizzes.

No quizzes mentionedLarge paperPresentations
“No quizzes. If you do your Hw and come to class you will do fine. .”
ENG201
“She assigns alot of presentations which I don't think are neccesary for the course”
ENG201

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“For those complaining how hard she is, then you probably are not serious about your education. Great Teacher if u want to know English.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person reviews spanning 2002-2013, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Mrs. Robeson is an amazing teacher! Anyone that doesn't like english will .”

⚠️ Polarizing Classroom

35/100

“A horrible teacher. She doesn't accept anyone else's opinions and constantly goes on about her personal life.”

📝

32/100

“shes extremely picky about grammer and minor errors. shes not one to care as much about what you write as how you write it.”

📅

18/100

“If you miss a day, you might as well leave the class because .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a fun teacher with a big heart.
  • She talked constantly about her book she is writing.
  • Too serious, and new opinions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She's picky but you will learn your grammar because of it!
  • Do your HWK and you're fine.
  • Says one thing, but then grades on another basis... ...

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Kim is the reason I am a writing major!
  • I loved hearing her stories!
  • Her opinions are the only ones that matter. Good luck.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen mostly detailed but older (2002-2013) reviews show a consistent polarized split, so but not recent.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1004 reviews
ENG2053 reviews
ENG1012 reviews
ENG2012 reviews
ENGL2022 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG1002011 review
ENGL1001 review
ENGL2051 review
SDCCWRITING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values