AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Judith Partaine

ALGEB830 · MATH101 · MATH830 · MATH820 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Only take her if you can teach yourself math and ; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesHeavy homeworkIntimidating demeanorPolarizing teacherRude when questioned
  • some call her easy if you do the work, many call her rude and chaotic.
  • and often returned late or lost.
  • Lectures are often described as .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

A minority say turning in homework and , but many report class-wide failure and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content is developmental math, but , and high difficulty ratings make it feel hard for many students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but multiple students say you must come to class and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Positive voices exist, but the , and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, yet many report harsh marking, lost papers, and whole classes failing.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly report lots of , and multi-page reviews before tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Reviews split between patient explainers and students , and disorganized.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades hinge on frequent homework plus tests that some say become easy only if .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math classes feel high-school-like to some, with , and frequent complaints about rudeness and lost work, though a minority say doing the .

Main concern

Disorganization, heavy workload, and a cold or intimidating and failures.

What students said

“ . No idea whats going on one day to the next.”
MATH830
“worst. teacher. ever. NOT EVEN JOKING.”
MATH830
“she is sooo easy!!!! All you have to do is turn hw in and do average in tests and you pretty much pass”
MATH830

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; some say homework makes them easy, others say tests do not match what was studied.

In-class testsHomework-driven prepReview packets before tests

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; a few students say tests mismatch the review work.

In-class testsHeavy homework prepReview packets
“Assigns plenty of homework, but if you do it well it makes the .”
MATH830
“ .”
MATH101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ so just DON'T do it!”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person reviews (2008-2012), , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She is very intimidating, she doesn't speak clear when giving her lectures, has an attitude like she expects you to know everything”

📚 Workload Load

28/100

“ ”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

32/100

“PLEASE SAVE YOURSELF THE .”

✅ Minority Easy Path

52/100

“All you have to do is turn hw in and do average in tests and you pretty much pass no matter what.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is also very rude!!
  • When she lectures she is all over the
  • Very good instructor. Will spend as much time explaining a concept as it takes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Started with 32 students... We are down to 11
  • she is sooo easy!!!!
  • if you do the hw, come to class and youll do great!

Theme 3

📂 About Organization

  • No idea whats going on one day to the next

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are old (2008-2012) and highly polarized, limiting modern reliability.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH83010 reviews
MATH8205 reviews
MATH1012 reviews
ALGEB8301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values