AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Frank Nocozy

STATS · MATH125 · MATH100 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready to learn the material yourself with outside help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesMust self-teachDisorganized prepNice but ineffective
  • Students describe him as nice but .
  • Success often requires tutoring or learning on your own.
  • , yet lecture organization is weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

, but students need regular tutoring or .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Course content is standard difficulty; the .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Students say he cannot teach and you must learn on your own.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One student says tests are fair and not too hard, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not heavily detailed; the and tutoring.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Across , and hard to learn from.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

65/100

Comments center on tests being fair while lectures fail to prepare students.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math and stats students say Frank is easygoing but , and .

Main concern

Weak lecture clarity means you may not learn in class.

What students said

“o man this guy CANT teach. but u and ur classmates have to learn on your own.”
STATS
“his . and does not prepare his classes in advance.”
MATH100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as fair and not too hard, with .

Fair testsNot too hard

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as fair and not too hard; .

Fair testsNot too hard
“ .”
MATH100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“o man this guy CANT teach. but u and ur classmates have to learn on your own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting unclear teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ ”

🧰

25/100

“u and ur classmates have to learn on your own.”

📝 Fair Tests

55/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his
  • and does not prepare his classes in advance.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Support

  • I had to get regular tutoring to get a good grade.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three short reviews spanning 2006-2012, with consistent criticism but thin detail and no grade data.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1001 review
MATH1251 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values