AI Rate Professor

Science

Margaret Eggers

GEOL101 · GEOL03 · EART106 · EARTHSCIE · OCEA101 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless and and write strong essays.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEssay-heavy workloadWeak teachingAssignment delegatorTricky quizzesNot recommended
  • Most students describe her as unhelpful and poor at teaching content.
  • Courses lean on heavy writing and .
  • A if you already write well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

and , so an A is not free.

; no online-format reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

High difficulty ratings plus heavy writing and book-dependent learning make content hard.

; no online-format reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

; no online-format reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most reviews .

; no online-format reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

appears once, but as generous.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of essays and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students call her a bad communicator who delegates work instead of teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and weekly quizzes.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Reviews flag weak instruction, heavy writing, and .

Main concern

Poor communication and almost no .

What students said

“ . STAY AWAY!!!”
EART106
“Not much of a teacher, more of an assignment delegator”
EARTHSCIE
“A lot of writing. Be prepared.”
GEOL101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on writing and tricky quizzes rather .

Tricky weekly quizzesEssay-based assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews mention tricky quizzes and heavy essays but .

Tricky quizzesEssays
“The ”
OCEA101
“It's alot of essays so if you're not good at ”
GEOL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . STAY AWAY!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, stressing weak teaching and heavy writing. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Not much of a teacher, more of an assignment delegator”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“ . STAY AWAY!!!”

📝 Workload

28/100

“A lot of writing. Be prepared.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Bad communicator
  • Terrible online teacher
  • no idea how to teach what she knows

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Work

  • A lot of writing
  • It's alot of essays

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only six older reviews with mixed detail and no grade data, so .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

GEOL1012 reviews
EART1061 review
EARTHSCIE1 review
GEOL031 review
OCEA1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values