AI Rate Professor

English

Joseph Voth

ENG198 · LIT120 · LIT260 · ENGL201 · ENG280 · ENGL100 · ENGLISH100 · ENG201 · ENG803 · ENG101 · ENG098 · ENG202 · ENGL803 · ENG100 · ENGL202 · ENGLISH202 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want an engaging, low-stress English class and are willing to do the reading and speak up.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilarious lecturerGreat discussionsCalls on studentsLight homeworkWants you to pass
  • Funny, articulate English teacher who makes reading and discussion engaging
  • Workload is usually light if you do the reading and participate
  • Cold-calling is common and can feel annoying or embarrassing if unprepared

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Most students call the class easy with light work and if you participate and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is approachable and discussion-based, though some note tricky literature or .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance policy is not stated clearly, but cold-calling and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

, and making English enjoyable despite a few boring or hard notes.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Described as wanting students to pass, fair on assignments, and easy as a rule with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

, though some report lots of reading or grammar work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students praise funny, articulate discussions and or awkward.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

, and heavy class discussion rather than pure exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and participation with generally light assignments.

Main concern

Random cold-calling and occasional boring or monotone delivery for some students.

What students said

“he made class so funny and he actually made me enjoy interpreting and breaking apart books and movies”
LIT120
“Do the reading so you can participate in class discussion(70% of the class)”
ENGLISH202
“he'll call on you at random which gets really annoying”
ENG202

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and focus more on projects, discussion, and homework.

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; assessment centers on projects, homework, and discussion participation.

Project-based gradingClass discussion heavyHomework
“The grade ”
ENGL201
“do the and it will pay off”
ENG198

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and writting but he made class so funny and he actually made me enjoy interpreting and breaking apart books and movies!”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 in-person reviews spanning 2003-2011, highlighting humor, participation, and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

😂 Humor & Energy

85/100

“Probably the funniest English teacher I've ever taken.”

📚 Light but Real Work

78/100

“ students in class, otherwise easy class w/not a lot of assignments.”

👍

82/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very funny guy, very articulate with his words
  • Excellent speaker, do the homework
  • He likes to hear everyones thoughts even if he doesnt agree

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I took him for summer school and it was super easy
  • He also it not the , but he's easy as a rule

Theme 3

🗣️ About Class Participation

  • he'll call on you at random which gets really annoying
  • asks questions from students randomly
  • Come prepared or he'll embarass you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

24 in-person reviews span many years with consistent humor and ease themes, but data is older and sparse on grades or exams.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 54
3 out of 55
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1004 reviews
ENG2023 reviews
ENGL2013 reviews
LIT1202 reviews
ENG0981 review
Show 11 more courses
ENG1011 review
ENG1981 review
ENG2011 review
ENG2801 review
ENG8031 review
ENGL1001 review
ENGL2021 review
ENGL8031 review
ENGLISH1001 review
ENGLISH2021 review
LIT2601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values