AI Rate Professor

English

Julie Hatoff

ENGL1 · ENGL101 · ENGL202 · ENGL100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear expectationsUnorganized lecturesAvoidConfusingInexperienced return
  • Students repeatedly say expectations, due dates, and .
  • and some say they did not improve as writers.
  • Multiple .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Difficulty is moderate to high and stressful than fair.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content itself is standard English, but poor organization raises the effective challenge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students and report lost confidence and little skill growth.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and expectations make the process feel harsh even when intent is not clearly punitive.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload details are sparse; and organization more than sheer volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Described as , and rusty after a long break from teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments center on papers and writing tasks rather than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person English , and frustration that hurts writing confidence.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“not only did I not know when things were due, or what we were supposed to do when something was due”
ENGL101
“everyone in the class is always unprepared because ”
ENGL202
“ !”
ENGL1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring; .

Not clearly described

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; complaints focus on unclear paper and assignment expectations.

Unclear paper expectations
“not only did I not know when things were due, or what we were supposed to do when something was due”
ENGL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting unclear expectations and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ ”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ !”

😵 Clarity Problems

20/100

“ ”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Clarity & Organization

  • I not know when things were due

Theme 2

📝 About Writing Impact

  • She caused me to severely second guess my writing abilities
  • i feel i haven't improved in critical thinking skills

Theme 3

👎 About Recommendation

  • !
  • this is the first semester julie has taught in 20 years: it shows

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four older reviews (2007-2009) but they are consistently negative and reasonably detailed.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGL11 review
ENGL1001 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGL2021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values