AI Rate Professor

History

Jeno Kim

WORLDHISTORY · HISTORY2 · HIS7 · HIS2 · HIS128410 · HIS1 · HISTORY7 · 64 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
84.62%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take him if you like strong lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing LecturesDiscussion HeavyTough on WritingNo Textbook Needed OftenAI Sensitive Grading
  • Students love his storytelling lectures and say history becomes engaging and clear.
  • Many online classes are discussion and .
  • A vocal minority reports harsh writing grades and AI-related accusations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many students get A or A+ by keeping up with discussions, but perfect scores are hard and writing standards are strict.

Online A ; in person exams feel more straightforward if you attend.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is digestible through strong lectures, with difficulty coming mainly from weekly writing volume.

; in person leans more lecture and .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

; work is asynchronous video and posts.

; several in person reviews still expect coming to class.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Majority recommend him for great lectures and .

Online praise is common but more polarized; in person comments are almost purely positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Rubrics and dropped low scores help, but and AI accusations lower perceived leniency.

Format shift

Online writing grades draw the most toughness complaints; in as clearer.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly discussions, notes, and .

Format shift

Online has recurring discussion posts; accelerated terms feel heavier.

Teaching experience

Good

83/100

Lecture quality is excellent and engaging, tempered by recurring criticism of harsh or .

Format shift

Both formats praise lectures; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Online and quizzes more than big exams; some older in .

Format shift

Online is discussion and quiz centered; in person older reviews mention three tests and a final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person students highlight fun story-like lectures and and study notes.

Main concern

, so current classroom details are thinner than online.

What students said

“His lectures are amazing!!! he tells it like it is!!!”
HIS2
“he makes history class fun and exciting!”
HISTORY2
“you are graded on 3 test and the final.”
HIS1

Remote format

Online

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online is lecture videos plus weekly discussions and sometimes quizzes; easy if consistent, but .

Main concern

and AI suspicion can hurt scores even when content understanding is solid.

What students said

“Bro first Professor to actually give lectures that are good.”
HIS2
“he wrongly accused me of using AI and it impacted my grade in my discussion.”
HIS7
“No mid term or final”
HIS7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and grade through discussions and quizzes instead.

Discussion PostsOptional or No FinalQuizzes with DropsLecture Based WritingLittle Proctoring Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Older in person reviews describe clear exams based on lectures rather than heavy online writing.

Three Tests and FinalLecture Based ExamsClear Grading
“you are graded on 3 test and the final.”
HIS1
“ if you simply study.”
HIS2

Online

Online often has , relying on discussions and quizzes with lowest scores dropped.

No Final OftenWeekly DiscussionsQuizzesDropped Lowest Score
“there is ”
HIS7
“ . There was a lot of reading and writing, but overall, very easy.”
HIS2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hands down the . His lectures are amazing!!! he tells it like it is!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, balancing lecture praise against strict writing and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Lecture Quality

90/100

“Bro first Professor to actually give lectures that are good.”

✍️ Writing Grade Strictness

48/100

“It's almost impossible to get a 6/6 on his discussions.”

👍 Overall Recommendation

80/100

“ classes.”

🤖

40/100

“he wrongly accused me of using AI and it impacted my grade in my discussion.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he makes history class fun and exciting!
  • his lectures never go off topic and are SO informational
  • he tells it like it is!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Super easy and structured class.
  • he's a tough grader,
  • Keep on track and this will be the most simple A you could ever get.

Theme 3

⚠️ and AI

  • he accused me of cheating because I wrote it too fast
  • Professor uses ai just to check if an
  • he criticizes your work as though you are stupid.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

64

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with a large online sample and recurring themes on lectures, discussions, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 549
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

HIS716 reviews
HIS215 reviews
HIS112 reviews
WORLDHISTORY3 reviews
HISTORY72 reviews
Show 2 more courses
HIS1284101 review
HISTORY21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

37

A+ 18 · A 19

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1