AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Adam Felton

PSY1 · PSY50 · PSY1H · PSYCH48 · PSY2 · PYSCH1 · PSY48 · 115 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60.87%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Prefer in person only if you can handle long lectures and strict integrity policing; if you want a safe grade.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCheating AccusationsLong LecturesTough GraderSarcastic HumorPolarizing
  • Online sections draw many cheating accusations, zeros, and failed grades.
  • In person he can be funny, memorable, and caring if you show up and work.
  • Long off-topic lectures and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Many Ds and Fs appear online; even success stories say you must study hard, use , and never look like you cheated.

Online is much harder to earn an A due to integrity flags; in person is fairer but still not easy.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, and misaligned quizzes make the content feel harder than a typical intro psych elective.

Online difficulty spikes with 3-4 hour lectures; in person is challenging but more navigable with attendance.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Policies vary, but and participation is often pushed.

In person strongly rewards showing up; online has recorded .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About 61 percent would take again; in-person fans love him while online students frequently say never again.

Recommendation is much stronger in person than online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

cheating and limited feedback on wrong answers.

Format shift

Strictness is most extreme online; in person still tough but more explainable.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Weekly quizzes, long lecture videos, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online lecture length is the biggest workload driver; in person is lecture-heavy with homework.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

hilarious and insightful for some, condescending and chaotic for others.

Format shift

In-person teaching gets warmer reviews; online teaching quality is frequently panned.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Quizzes and exams dominate the grade with limited assignment weight and .

Format shift

; online exams are especially high stakes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person many find him hilarious and helpful if , and engage, though material can still be hard.

Main concern

Lectures wander, tests may not match slides, and .

What students said

“Adam is a very funny professor, his lectures are very memorable”
PSY50
“ if you genuinely want to learn.”
PSY48
“Don't be lazy, don't cheat, and ask questions!”
PSY50

Remote format

Online

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and frequent cheating accusations.

Main concern

Students report unjustified AI or cheating flags that .

What students said

“He accused me of and did not provide evidence to me of how I cheated”
PSY1
“If you ever want to fail an . He will acuse you of cheating with no evidence”
PSY1
“Lecture is 3 to 4 hours long and he is always off topic.”
PSY1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and , and tightly policed for cheating.

Test heavyCheating accusationsOne attempt quizzesLong lecture-based exams

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests; showing up and not cheating are emphasized.

Notes on some testsAttendance mattersStudy from quizzes
“notes ”
PSY50
“Just do the work & don't cheat.”
PSY48

Online

Online students report severe integrity enforcement, zeros for alleged AI use, and exams misaligned with lectures.

Cheating accusationsNo clear evidence givenLecture videos required
“He accused me of and did not provide evidence to me of how I cheated”
PSY1
“Accused me of cheating in and though I studied.”
PSYCH48

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ its better.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews with . Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Online Integrity Risk

25/100

“He accused me of and did not provide evidence”

🎭 Polarizing Humor

48/100

“he is sarcastic as can be. Such dry humor.”

📚 Long Lectures

35/100

“Please be aware that he gives 3-4 hour lectures that have nothing to do with .”

🏫 Better In Person

60/100

“ if you genuinely want to learn.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are very memorable
  • Lectures are 2-3 hrs long
  • He seems to have a humorous and funny personality

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • accuses you of cheating
  • Anyone who works even lazy hard will get at least a B

Theme 3

💻 About Online Risk

  • Would never take Adam Felton's class again

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

115

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent reviews with strong format split and repeated integrity and lecture themes provide high-confidence polarization data.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 555
4 out of 518
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 533

Course coverage

PSY124 reviews
PSY28 reviews
PSY488 reviews
PSY506 reviews
PSYCH482 reviews
Show 2 more courses
PSY1H1 review
PYSCH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

50 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 4 · A 9

B range

11

B+ 4 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

11

D+ 4 · D 7

F

6

F 6

No letter grade reported

5

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3