AI Rate Professor

Early Childhood Education

Melissa Thompson

EAR30 · EAR42 · EAR2027235 · EAR22316 · EAR28 · EAR20 · EAR24 · PATTY1111 · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
26.23%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid if you care about grades or ; if you can reverse-engineer strict APA expectations alone.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh Nitpicky GraderUnclear RubricsSlow GradingExcessive PapersDisorganized Canvas
  • Most recent reviews warn of .
  • and .
  • A minority of older or in-person students liked her personality, but overall recommendation is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students repeatedly say full credit is rare even when they follow the rubric and work hard.

Online is especially harsh; a few in-person students still report better outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content plus extreme paper volume and than it should.

Both formats feel hard; online adds platform and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

, while pure online work can be more asynchronous.

In-person and lab courses enforce presence more; as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

and a flood of warnings outweigh the smaller set of positive fans.

Recent online reviews are most negative; older in-person praise exists but is outnumbered.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

and ignored rubrics are the dominant complaint across courses.

Format shift

and most frequent.

Workload

Overwhelming

14/100

Excessive papers, readings, and stacked deadlines create an overwhelming weekly load.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy papers; online also piles platform modules and responses.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Many students , and organization is weak.

Format shift

A minority of in-person students praise energy and care; online teaching reviews are largely negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and projects more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online is almost entirely assignment-driven; some sections still include a few Canvas exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person is still tough and , though some students found her caring, funny, and more workable face-to-face.

Main concern

Unclear expectations and .

What students said

“I learned how not to be a teacher!”
EAR30
“she is aweful”
EAR24
“Shes a , but just make sure to follow instructions and be super detailed”
EAR24

Remote format

Online

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ECE sections are heavily criticized for , and extreme point deductions for minor misses.

Main concern

Rubrics not followed, late grades, and .

What students said

“She gives a rubric yet doesn't follow it?”
EAR24
“missing even one task , like responding to a classmate, could cost you 30-40% of your grade.”
EAR20
“honestly the .”
EAR28

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment risk comes more from harsh assignment grading than from classic proctored exams.

Few Traditional ExamsPaper and Project HeavyCanvas Exams SometimesStrict Rubric Nitpicking

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work still centers on papers and exams.

Lesson PlansGroup ProjectsTough Paper Grading
“just make sure to follow instructions and be super detailed when making the lesson plans.”
EAR24
“ .”
EAR28

Online

Online assessment is mostly essays and and .

Essay HeavyCanvas ExamsDelayed Feedback
“ . .”
EAR24
“ few things fixed”
EAR22316

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Stay for away from her unless you wanna have a bad grade you've been warned”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting harsh grading, workload, and minority positive outliers. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

24/100

“ ”

⚖️

16/100

“She gives a rubric yet doesn't follow it?”

📄 Overwhelming Workload

14/100

“gives a stupid amount of work, terrible at instructions”

Theme 1

📉

  • doesn't consistently follow the
  • you will never get
  • She finds minor reasons to withhold credit

Theme 2

🗂️ About Organization

  • and a
  • She does not grade in a timely manner

Theme 3

❤️ Minority Positive Views

  • Professor Thompson is kind and understanding
  • She cares about her students
  • she continuously encouraged me to push through

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with strong recent volume and and in-person formats.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 510
1 out of 533

Course coverage

EAR2420 reviews
EAR3013 reviews
EAR208 reviews
EAR284 reviews
EAR422 reviews
Show 3 more courses
EAR20272351 review
EAR223161 review
PATTY11111 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 7 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 5

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 4

D range

6

D 5 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

17

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 3 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 8