AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gabriel Murillo

MAT25 · MAT5 · MAT12 · MAT36 · MATH12 · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
36.07%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless full-time job, and will never miss syllabus quizzes or discussion posts.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderPearson-heavyHuge end-of-term extra creditPolarized reviewsOnline self-teach risk
  • in-person survivors praise lectures and giant , while many call him harsh and unsupportive.
  • Online and teaching, rigid rules, and drops.
  • Expect , and little rounding or forgiveness for mistakes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

High grades are possible with perfect compliance and end-term , but , and no forgiveness for small errors.

; online often feels like mission impossible.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material may be standard stats or calc, but , and .

Some in-person students say content is easy if you attend; online difficulty ratings spike.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most in-person and as required, with strict skip limits.

Online Mat5 sometimes marks attendance no, but discussion and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Only about 36% would take again and many reviews say run or .

In-person recommendations are warmer; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; tiny mistakes, rounding refusals, and terms-of-service zeros repeatedly tank grades.

Format shift

; online grading is often called arbitrary and perfectionist.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and study-as-a-job expectations appear constantly.

Format shift

Heavy in both formats; online still piles HW without live teaching support.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

and care, but many report frantic style, book-only help, and no real teaching online.

Format shift

; online teaching quality is widely panned.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Discussions feed midterms and sections, and .

Format shift

; online adds oral exams and syllabus-quiz landmines.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

interactive lectures and huge late-semester help motivated students, but homework, discussions, and .

Main concern

Fast lectures, heavy HW, and zero room for small mistakes keep failure and .

What students said

“Take him in-person. !”
MATH12
“Content wise the class is easy but there is 0 room for mistakes.”
MAT12
“he is a and givesss so muchhh HW I could not keep up.”
MAT12

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students frequently report self-teaching via Pearson or , and many drops.

Main concern

Little instruction, rigid zero policies, and oral or paperwork failures can tank otherwise passing work.

What students said

“This class was run entirely through Pearson, with zero actual teaching.”
MAT12
“This is a self-guided course, no instructor lectures! and exams!”
Mat5
“ and the purpose of online.”
Mat5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes and unforgiving, with oral components and paperwork failures that can zero a final.

Oral examsTerms of service zero riskMultiple midterms and finalsDiscussion-linked examsNo study guides often

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and demanding; discussions prepare exams and huge may arrive late if you survive.

Four tests commonDiscussion-heavy prepIn-class testsLarge end extra credit
“Final worth 30 of grade”
MAT12
“2 small exams, 1 midterm and final = 4 in total over term.”
MAT12
“2 oral exams, make sure you do both I forgot to pre register for the zoom and lost 30 points and my A.”
MAT25

Online

Online comments describe oral midterms/finals, mandatory terms signing, Pearson testing, and .

Oral examsTerms of Service signature requiredPearson examsSyllabus quiz day one
“You also need to sign the terms and conditions for the midterm and final.”
MAT12
“ and the purpose of online.”
Mat5
“I was failed on the midterm and .”
MAT12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want to pass! I heard online is much harder.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, contrasting in-person support with . Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Online Experience

20/100

“This class was run entirely through Pearson, with zero actual teaching.”

🎁 Lifeline

70/100

“Professor gave HUGE in the end!! He helped me pass the class!”

📉

22/100

“there is 0 room for mistakes.”

👍 Split Recommendations

36/100

“AVOID if you want a professor that cares about your success.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are great and interactive
  • Timid/frantic teaching style
  • He provides only YouTube videos and will refer you to his syllabus

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • 0 room for mistakes
  • givesss so muchhh HW I could not keep up

Theme 3

🚫 About Support and Fairness

  • This guy is just collecting paycheck not teaching!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over years with rich detail, consistent polarization by format, and broad grade outcomes make the .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 57
3 out of 56
2 out of 54
1 out of 528

Course coverage

MAT1236 reviews
Mat510 reviews
MATH122 reviews
MAT251 review
mat361 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

4

D+ 3 · D- 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

16

Drop/Withdrawal 10 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 4