AI Rate Professor

Guidance

Wendy sharky

CCR · GUIDANCE · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Skip unless you need her section and can tolerate disorganization and a harsh interpersonal style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCondescendingDisorganizedBusywork heavyPolarizingTough grader
  • Majority of , and busywork that feels unrelated to learning.
  • A minority of students praise her as caring, inspirational, and .
  • High letter grades are common, but many still report a frustrating classroom experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students still report A or A+, but and busywork mean an A is not effortless.

Both online and grading fairness.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty sits mid-range with busywork and .

In-person CCR and guidance comments drive most difficulty signals; online adds organization stress.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory with participation emphasized.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

, and recent detailed reviews lean strongly negative.

; the online review is firmly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and picky rules .

Format shift

as confusing and blame-heavy.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students , and work that feels excessive or off-topic.

Format shift

Busywork complaints are strongest in in-person CCR reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

A few find her patient and inspiring, but more describe condescension, disorganization, and weak instruction.

Format shift

In-person opinions are polarized; the sole online review is fully negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on assignments, busywork, and .

Format shift

Neither format clearly documents a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

two highly positive about patience and care, three very negative about condescension, busywork, and poor math teaching.

Main concern

, and busywork dominate the negative majority.

What students said

“She is very condescending, passive aggressive and doesn't know how to teach (esp. math).”
CCR
“She's a kind and if you follow along.”
CCR
“I asked her for help finding scholarships she helped me find two.”
guidance

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and grading, with blame shifted onto students for poor grades.

Main concern

Organization and after confusion.

What students said

“ and grading. Then confuses students and blames them for their bad grade.”
CCR

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; risk centers on assignments, participation, and .

Unclear exam policyAssignment heavyParticipation matters

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on busywork and ; they do not clearly document proctored or open-book exams.

BusyworkPeer gradingParticipation matters
“Often makes !!!”
CCR

Online

Online comments emphasize assignment and .

Assignment heavyGrading confusion
“ and grading.”
CCR

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very condescending, passive aggressive and doesn't know how to teach (esp. math).”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

👎 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Instructor changes instructions without prior notice, blames students for her ”

⚠️ Classroom Tone

30/100

“She is very condescending, passive aggressive and doesn't know how to teach (esp. math).”

💗 Minority Praise

70/100

“ , and inspires .”

📋 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“Instead of helping us she is holding us back.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • doesn't know how to teach (esp. math)
  • makes mistakes, but she listens and helps fix them
  • and grading

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • gives out way too much busywork
  • A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • kind and helpful math teacher
  • inspired me to look at other law degrees
  • condescending, passive aggressive

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews with concrete detail help, but the tiny sample and polarized tones limit confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CCR5 reviews
guidance1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1