AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Andrea Stoll

ACC1B · ACC1A · ACC63 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take Stoll for ACC 1A or 1B if you will put in weekly Cengage time; she makes accounting understandable and fair.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCengage homework flexibleMultiple attemptsFast email repliesCaring accounting mentorClear grading criteria
  • Perfect quality scores and 100% would-take-again across online and in-person.
  • Accounting still takes real study time on Cengage, but multiple attempts and lectures help.
  • and unlimited homework tries reduce high-stakes pressure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many earn A or A+ with multiple attempts and help, but students stress you must study and spend real hours.

Online emphasizes multiple attempts; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, yet accounting content and Cengage volume keep intellectual demand moderate to high.

Both formats say she makes accounting doable, not trivial.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

Several ; some in-person still expect presence for practice.

Online is more flexible; in-person often still benefits from class practice.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Every review is a 5 and ; students call her a top MVC accounting professor.

Unanimous across online and in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

and quiz attempts, late assignment windows, and .

Format shift

Similar support online and in person.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

and ; not a five-minute workload class.

Format shift

In-person comments most strongly warn about time load.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

, fast responses, and genuine care dominate all 16 reviews.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Cengage homework and and occasional discussions or group work.

Format shift

and quizzes; in-person adds class practice and mixed finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

; finals may include group plus at-home parts; still time-consuming Cengage work.

Main concern

Class is not free A; Cengage can take 2-3 hours per assignment.

What students said

“Final exam was 2 parts, first was a and the second was a .”
ACC1B
“Majority of her Cengage hw requires 2-3 hours of studying and doing research outside the book”
ACC1A

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online ACC runs on Cengage homework and , and very fast support.

Main concern

Material can still feel hard; plan weekly hours for Cengage even with unlimited tries.

What students said

“There was and quizzes. For the midterm and final, we could save our work and go back to it when we wanted.”
ACC1A
“You are able to have unlimited amount of tries on HW. Which helps you practice more.”
ACC1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes allow practice, multiple tries, and sometimes at-home completion, making assessment less harsh.

Multiple attempts on HW and quizzesSave and return midterm or finalAt-home multiple choice finalGroup project final partCengage platform

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and at-home multiple choice; quizzes sometimes done in class.

Group final partAt-home MC finalIn-class quizzes
“Final exam was 2 parts, first was a and the second was a .”
ACC1B
“ helpful. Part of the and the other part is done in class.”
ACC1A

Online

Online students report Cengage quizzes and and resumed; no Lockdown Browser mentioned.

Cengage quizzesMultiple attemptsSave and return exams
“For the midterm and and go back to it when we wanted.”
ACC1A
“You are able to have unlimited amount of tries on HW.”
ACC1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's so , and flexible. She made accounting doable and comfortable for everyone.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting care, Cengage workload, and flexible assessment. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“This professor is one of the and understanding when she teaches”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

40/100

“this class is not an easy A. You have to take a good chunk of your time to study and read the materials”

❤️ Student Support

96/100

“She will always responds ASAP, even outside of class. and understandable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she takes the and
  • She wanted you to understand the concepts rather than strictly do the math.
  • She's very funny and wants to help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You should have no reason to fail this class.
  • There was and quizzes.
  • You have to put in the work, but .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She helped me get into UCR and even wrote me a letter of recommendation.
  • She truly cares about her student!
  • She really cares about her students success and health.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

16 consistent five-star reviews with rich detail across formats and years; sample is solid but smaller than 50-review peers.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACC1A10 reviews
ACC1B5 reviews
ACC631 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 5 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1