AI Rate Professor

Early Childhood Education

Darrylon Evans

EAR28 · EAR20 · EAR19 · EAR42 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
37.14%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you and can thrive with heavy ambiguous work and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderUnclear InstructionsLots of PapersAPA HeavyPolarizing Feedback
  • Many students report , and a cold or rude tone when they ask for help.
  • Workload is paper- and discussion-heavy with reflections that feel grad-level for undergrad EAR classes.
  • A and growth focus, but and recent online reviews lean strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some earn As with constant writing effort, but tiny errors and and stressful.

; and F stories.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content is not advanced theory, yet volume, APA rigor, and vague prompts make the course feel much harder than peers.

Online workload complaints are stronger; in person still cites heavy reflections and papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

and some online mark participation or attendance as required.

In person more often mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Would-take-again is about 37 percent, and recent online reviews overwhelmingly warn others away.

A few in-person fans exist, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

; students say she docks for tiny mistakes while denying she seeks perfection.

Format shift

graded especially hard.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

, and APA papers create constant time pressure.

Format shift

Online 8-week terms feel especially stacked; in person still has heavy papers and projects.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

A , but many describe rudeness, off-topic lectures, and unhelpful clarification.

Format shift

Online communication complaints are harsher; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and projects more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy; weekly APA writing is a recurring online theme.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In and funny, but lectures often go off topic while , and harshly graded.

Main concern

Heavy papers and picky deductions still overwhelm even when personality feels nicer face to face.

What students said

“the actual assignments are so heavy with unclear directions and program”
EAR19
“In person would 100% better your experience with her.”
EAR20
“ and vague. When students ask for clarification, she becomes frustrated”
EAR28

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online EAR sections draw the sharpest criticism: unclear Canvas instructions, harsh , and unwelcoming responses to questions.

Main concern

Vague instructions plus strict grading and and stress.

What students said

“Assignment instructions are extremely unclear, difficult to follow, and .”
EAR42
“Wrote 2 research papers in apa every week with discussions.”
EAR28
“Horrible Professor! She will belittle you for .”
EAR20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly written work and discussions; a few .

APA PapersWeekly DiscussionsReflectionsProjectsSome Weekly Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person still centers heavy papers and reflections, with some weekly reading and tests but .

So Many PapersReflectionsGroup ProjectsSome Weekly Tests
“ and .”
EAR28
“So many reflections paired with .”
EAR19

Online

Online reviews focus on weekly discussions, research papers, and .

APA EssaysWeekly DiscussionsUnclear PromptsProjects
“Wrote 2 research papers in apa every week with discussions.”
EAR28
“ , and very little support from her.”
EAR19

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Assignment instructions are extremely unclear, difficult to follow, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews across online-heavy EAR coursework, with High credibility from consistent instruction and .

📝

28/100

“ and homework, is not helpful when asked questions”

📉

24/100

“ ”

📚 Overwhelming Papers

18/100

“You will not have a life while taking this class.”

💚 Minority Praise

70/100

“She always gave me amazing feedback and really helped me .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures always go off topic & in-class is unenjoyable
  • she genuinely is one of the
  • The professor is

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • she grades your work like your life depends on it

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she responded very rudely so I dropped the class
  • She is truly an amazing professor
  • Will indirectly call you out and make you feel stupid.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

35 recent and older reviews with repeated wording about unclear instructions and loyal minority.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 517

Course coverage

EAR2813 reviews
EAR2010 reviews
EAR199 reviews
EAR423 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 4 · A 5 · A- 4

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 3 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1