AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Lucia Gudiel

SOC12 · ANT122014 · ANT2 · ANNT1L · ANT1 · ANTHRO1 · ANT24315 · ANT6 · ANT527750 · ANT25006 · ANT5 · ANT25480 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
85/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
80.56%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you follow the PowerPoints and use .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious LecturesExtra Credit FriendlyClear PowerPointsMostly Easy APassionate Anthropologist
  • Most students find ANT courses manageable with slides, notes, and
  • and engaging; online quality is more mixed
  • Attendance is often optional but

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many report , and strong A/A+ outcomes with steady work.

Online and ; online has a .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is approachable for gen-ed students when using lectures, videos, and PowerPoints.

In-person often feels lighter; some online .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

Often not graded as , but lectures and census periods make showing up important.

Online is more flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

, and despite some detractors.

In-person recommendations are stronger and more consistent than online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

is common and many call her an easy or .

Format shift

A few online reviews call her a .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Usually worksheets, discussions, and a few exams; some online terms assign heavy weekly work.

Format shift

Online can spike to lots of homework; in-person is often lighter.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students praise passion, humor, and .

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is stronger; online quality is more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of , and a .

Format shift

Some sections grade by few major items; others add weekly chapter work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and resource-rich with review sessions and mostly fair grading.

Main concern

Long lectures and .

What students said

“The a review (in the style of jeopardy) for the week of.”
ANT1
“If you showed up to the lectures... you should pass with an A.”
ANT1
“Exams were extremely easy. 90% of answers for homework and presentations.”
ANT1

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are often straightforward with chapter quizzes and , but a few report heavy weekly work or poor communication.

Main concern

and rare reports of disengagement or .

What students said

“her class is pretty straightforward, ten questions for each chapter and just don't cheat/use AI/plagiarize.”
ANT1
“All the answers can be found in her PowerPoints. She is an and .”
ANT1
“Never lectured. Never provided any help.”
ANNT1L

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

slides, with review sessions and .

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

jeopardy-style reviews and slide-based answers.

Take-home testsJeopardy reviewSlide-based examsExtra credit
“The a review (in the style of jeopardy) for the week of.”
ANT1
“ .”
ANT1

Online

Online assessments rely on chapter quizzes and assignment essays from PowerPoints and readings.

Chapter quizzesPowerPoint-based answersExtra creditDiscussion posts
“Completing detailed and and .”
ANT1
“she has lots of opportunities.”
ANT1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Literally just go to class and pay attention to lectures or if you don't go to class read the powerpoint lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews (10 online, 28 in-person), highlighting ease, humor, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor G. is the . She's accommodating, caring, and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

80/100

“I would take this class again 100%”

🎁 Easy A Path

78/100

“Lots of throughout the course.”

😂 Classroom Energy

80/100

“LOVED HER CLASS!!! I am super interested in phys anthro, but she is very clearly passionate about the subject.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Funny, kind and
  • She teaches in a way where people can understand
  • her lectures included videos to comprehend the material better

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • her class is pretty straightforward
  • As long as you do the work how it is asked you should get a passing grade

Theme 3

⚠️ Mixed Online Experiences

  • she assigned 8-10 assignments weekly
  • She was also very rude
  • ! Had her through COVID and all the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

38 reviews across online and size with mostly consistent themes.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 510
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ANT121 reviews
ANT64 reviews
ANT53 reviews
ANT22 reviews
ANNT1L1 review
Show 7 more courses
ANT1220141 review
ANT243151 review
ANT250061 review
ANT254801 review
ANT5277501 review
ANTHRO11 review
SOC121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 4 · A 13

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2