AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rachel Buiter

MATH213 · MAT1ACALCULUS · MAT1A · MATH096 · MATH1ACACLULUS · MATH110 · MAT27516 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you will grind homework and study guides; avoid if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkStudy guides helpTest and quiz heavyMixed lecture qualityLenient late policy for some
  • , and completion-based homework
  • and they relied on YouTube to learn
  • Workload is consistently high with weekly quizzes and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As and high grades appear, but , and exams; several report B, C+, or C.

Online Stats feels harder to get an A; calc sections reward study-guide grind more.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Calculus and stats are repeatedly called hard, with lots of , and test weight.

Both formats report high difficulty; online Stats is especially harsh.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, and online zoom help is non-mandatory.

Online optional zoom; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but strong RUN comments and quality-2 reviews keep this conditional.

; online Stats and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Completion-based HW, dropped low quiz/HW, and late passes for and test-heavy tags.

Format shift

Online calc notes six late turn-ins; other sections feel tougher on tests.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and exam weight dominate almost every review.

Format shift

Consistent heavy load online and in person.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Majority praise easy-to-follow lectures and study guides, but a loud minority say teaching is random, too fast, or absent.

Format shift

In-person calc mostly positive; online Stats is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes, chapter tests, and .

Format shift

One review specifies quizzes 30%, tests 40%, final 30%.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Most in-person and hybrid-style calc reviews praise study guides and , while a minority call lectures fast or useless with .

Main concern

, and if lectures do not land.

What students said

“ and similar to the tests so make sure to study those.”
MAT1ACALCULUS
“ !! RUN!”
MATH1ACACLULUS

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one Stats student says run from module-only teaching, another Calc student praises leniency and .

Main concern

Intro and tests.

What students said

“this was the so far... RUN!”
MATH110
“She does assign a good amount of homework but grades on completion not rightness.”
MAT27516

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are central; study guides help but and .

Study guidesWeekly quizzesChapter testsFinal examTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, weekly quizzes, and long chapter tests; no Lockdown Browser mentioned.

Study guidesWeekly quizzesLong chapter testsFinal
“ ... Study those and you'll do good on the exams.”
MAT1A
“ ! Weekly quizzes 30% Test 40% Final 30%”
MATH1ACACLULUS

Online

Online comments emphasize heavy modules, homework, and .

Test heavyLots of homeworkModules
“Lots of ”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do the homework and the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 math reviews across online and and heavy assessment. Credibility rating: Medium.

📘 Study Guide Advantage

75/100

“ and similar to the tests”

🏋️ Heavy Workload

28/100

“unnecessary LONG HW that doesnt count for anything”

⚠️ Polarized Teaching

40/100

“Did not teach just said random stuff no one understood.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lecture videos were easy to understand
  • Lectures were super easy to follow
  • Lectures way 2 fast!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do the homework and the
  • this was one of the hardest classes I have taken
  • grades on completion not rightness

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is a very understanding teacher
  • anytime I
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews from 2020-2023 give decent detail and a , but mixed course levels and polarized quality scores keep credibility medium-high rather than high.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MAT1A3 reviews
MAT1ACALCULUS1 review
MAT275161 review
MATH0961 review
MATH1101 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH1ACACLULUS1 review
MATH2131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1