AI Rate Professor

Business

Frank Almeida

BUS51 · BUS2022062 · BUS5328834 · MGMT490 · BUS53 · BUS20 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate chaos; seek another business professor if possible.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedSlow to gradePoor communicationMixed over timeFind another professor
  • Recent and mid-period reviews slam organization, syllabus errors, and
  • and called the class easy or engaging
  • 0% would-take-again among explicit answers; online sections especially weak

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students earned A/A+ with light effort, but others report lots of , and grades as low as C/B.

; online and some in-person reports describe confusion and heavier or .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

and harder, poorly paced courses depending on the term.

In-person BUS20 was called really easy; BUS51 and online sections felt harder and more chaotic.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

, though one older in-person comment said attendance was not important.

Online and ; one 2014 in-person review said attendance was not important.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Would-take-again is 0% , and several students say find another professor.

Older in-person praise exists, but online and later critiques dominate the takeaway.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Grades range from A+ to C; delayed grading and .

Format shift

; online students reported late grading and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Homework and chapter work are common; tags include lots of homework and .

Format shift

Online MGMT490 cites lots of homework; and a special interview project.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Scattered praise for passion and clarity is outweighed by reports of , wrong syllabi, and .

Format shift

Online experience is especially weak; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and projects dominate; exams are mentioned without strong study support.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and fun with easy grades; others cite bad pacing, wrong textbook posts, and .

Main concern

Quality varies by semester; disorganization and last-minute work still appear.

What students said

“ ! The class is really easy... I barely went to class lectures and got A.”
BUS20
“unorganized, course badly paced, posted wrong ”
BUS51
“Mr. Almeida is an amazing teacher. .”
BUS2022062

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report , outdated , and little instructor presence.

Main concern

Disorganization and almost no teaching interaction online.

What students said

“No interaction whatsoever... videos. No face to face.”
BUS20
“ . Sent an outdated syllabus that listed a different book... Horrible.”
BUS51
“find another professor.”
MGMT490

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on assignments and some exams, with little evidence of student-friendly open-book policies.

Homework heavyChapter questionsExams without study guides

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

heavy chapter assignments, not detailed exam proctoring rules.

Chapter assignmentsNo study guides for examsInterview assignment
“no study guides for exams”
BUS51
“ and .”
BUS5328834

Online

Online reviews focus on repetitive documents and exams.

Repetitive reading discussionsDelayed grading
“Repetitive documents to be read and discussed.”
BUS20
“He doesn't grade work until the end of semester so you have no way to anticipate your grade.”
BUS51

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“find another professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews (4 online, 4 in person), highlighting organization failures and mixed older praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

35/100

“No interaction whatsoever... videos. No face to face.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“find another professor.”

📂 Organization Issues

30/100

“unorganized, course badly paced, posted wrong ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • No interaction whatsoever... videos.
  • and passionate about what he is teaching.
  • Makes class time interesting & up to date.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is really easy... I barely went to class lectures and got A.
  • Lots of homework
  • He doesn't grade work until the end of semester so you have no way to anticipate your grade.

Theme 3

📂 About Organization

  • Sent an outdated syllabus that listed a different book
  • does not return emails in timely manner

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across years with detailed complaints and some praise; opinions split by era and format but recent online evidence is consistent.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BUS202 reviews
BUS512 reviews
BUS20220621 review
BUS531 review
BUS53288341 review
Show 1 more courses
MGMT4901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1