AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Christopher Jacinto

MAT12 · MATH165 · MATH12 · MATH53 · MAT53 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Great for stats-style MAT12 if you attend and study; avoid for MATH53 if you need slow, hand-holding support.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture heavyAttendance criticalMixed by courseExtra creditTest heavy for some
  • Strong praise in lower-level MAT12/MATH12 with and easy pass
  • Harsh criticism in MATH53—
  • Success depends on showing up daily, doing HW, and asking for tutoring

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A is reachable with , and tutoring, but MATH53 students say it is a struggle without prior fluency.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

MAT12 feels easy with ; MATH53 is described as difficult, fast, and test-heavy.

Difficulty varies sharply by course level within in-person sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Many tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass; .

In-person only; attendance and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students recommend him for MAT12, but a clear minority strongly advise avoiding MATH53.

Split is by course difficulty, not .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Some call him a ; others report failing without enough support.

Format shift

In-person only; MAT12 softer, MATH53 harsher in student eyes.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and frequent quizzes; some sections feel lots of homework and test heavy.

Format shift

Consistent in-person reports of HW and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

; a vocal group says he rushes and does not help struggling students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams, weekly quizzes, and finals carry heavy weight; workbook and .

Format shift

and few major tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

MAT12 students love him as easy and clear; MATH53 students report little help and failing grades.

Main concern

Higher-level sections can feel rushed with weekly quizzes and weak support when stuck.

What students said

“One of the easiest teachers! . a week and only 3 tests for the semester.”
MAT12
“He expects you to know lectures before class and . if you struggle with math.”
MATH53

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and ; success depends on attending and matching lecture material.

Weekly quizzes3–4 tests plus finalExam content from class/workbook

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Weekly quizzes and several tests; and the workbook, with .

Weekly quizzesTest heavyWorkbook-aligned examsExtra credit after tests
“ but mainly to review what was discussed in class. Everything in the workbook provided is on the exams.”
MAT12
“There was 4 total test and , but he does offer ”
MAT53

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Math has always been difficult subject for me to grasp but with Mr. Jacinto I was able to make sense of the material and passed with an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews, highlighting the MAT12 vs MATH53 split. Credibility rating: High.

📊 Course-Level Split

70/100

“ if you struggle with math. There are better professors out there.”

🎯 Clear for MAT12

85/100

“One of the easiest teachers! . a week and only 3 tests for the semester.”

⚠️

25/100

“There are so .”

👍 Effort Pays Off

72/100

“Your success in this class is on you to STUDY, ask Q's, and DO THE HW!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Funny guy, easy going
  • Lecture heavy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy pass if you go to class
  • Expects you to know lectures before class
  • and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support Gaps

  • He didnt help me when I had questions
  • Basically have to teach yourself
  • Felt like he just assumed I understood everything

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

12 reviews spanning 2016–2022 with clear course-level split and detailed positive and negative narratives.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH535 reviews
MAT123 reviews
MAT532 reviews
MATH121 review
MATH1651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values