AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sarah Bahk

MAT12 · MATH35 · MAT11 · MAT52 · MATH53 · MATH36 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Only take her if and ; many students prefer another math instructor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProStrong accentLots of homeworkConfusing lecturesFast paceMixed reviews
  • Teaching clarity is mixed; many say lectures are fast, confusing, or .
  • .
  • A few students praise her support and manageable workload when they keep up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Passing is possible with consistent work, but and .

Online review is more optimistic; in-person reviews stress self-teaching and heavy load.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students describe hard methods, fast lectures, and difficulty ratings that feel harder than the material needs to be.

In-person comments drive the challenge rating; the single online review is milder.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Tags and comments say skipping class hurts and showing up is needed to keep up.

Online review lists attendance mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

Only about one-third would take her again, with repeated warnings about confusion and homework.

The online review is positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some say failure is hard if you show up and work; others report confusion and .

Format shift

Limited grade data; online and one older in-person review sound fairer than the negative in-person set.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple reviews cite lots of , and writing volume that feels excessive.

Format shift

Heavy load is clearest in in-person geometry; online notes lots of .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Average quality is low because many students find lectures fast, hard to understand, and method-heavy.

Format shift

Online review is strong; warnings.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and frequent exams both matter; one student liked more exams with lower weight each.

Format shift

, and more exams; online is vague beyond required work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and frustration with pace, accent, and homework.

Main concern

Fast confusing lectures and .

What students said

“She goes pretty fast through lecture and .”
MAT11
“ . ... SO ?? and she asks for ALOT”
MAT52
“Lecture style is very easy to understand and she always makes sure you understand.”
MATH36

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online student found her supportive and and required work.

Main concern

Accent and .

What students said

“If you have questions or the time to make it clear”
MAT12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not detail proctoring; assessment seems standard with homework and several exams.

Multiple examsHomework heavyIn-class attendance pressure

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students mention multiple exams and .

More exams than mostHomework heavy
“ so they're weighed less heavy, which I like.”
MAT52

Online

Online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She goes pretty fast through lecture and . I've had to through Khan Academy”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting clarity issues, workload, and mixed praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ ”

📚 Workload

28/100

“its so necessary to give us SO ?? and she asks for ALOT and you write SO MUCH”

👍 Recommendation Rate

33/100

“ . I had her because she was the ONLY geometry professor”

🗣️ Accent & Clarity

40/100

“She does have an accent that is very strong, but she is understandable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She goes pretty fast through lecture and .
  • she teaches you the way she was tought and she makes it harder then wat it really is
  • Lecture style is very easy to understand and she always makes sure you understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She made it nearly impossible to fail as long as you show up to every class and put in the work.
  • You have to do the work in the class, but ultimately, she wants you to pass.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • She does have an accent, so if this bothers you, she is probably not the professor for you.
  • Does not give you the right tools to succeed, hard to understand sometimes.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 8 reviews spanning many years with thin detail and mixed signals lower confidence.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MAT112 reviews
MAT522 reviews
MAT121 review
MATH351 review
MATH361 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values