AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Myong Kim

MATH35 · GEOMMATH · MAT35 · MAT37 · MAT52 · MAT36 · MATH12 · MATH11 · MAT53 · MATH52 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you already learn math well from a textbook and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProThick Accent BarrierSelf-Study NeededExtra Credit SometimesHomework HeavyMixed Helpfulness
  • Accent intelligibility is the dominant complaint across many math courses.
  • Stronger math students can pass by reading the book and .
  • Recent reviews note unlimited homework tries, note cards, and occasional .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Homework retries and some help, but and weaker students often struggle.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

unless you already understand the material.

Difficulty .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while others do not, with little detailed enforcement discussion.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

A few students like her and , but if you need clear explanations.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some and , but a few students report unexpected low final grades despite solid test scores.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of homework and packets are common, though .

Format shift

Workload evidence is in-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Accent and thin explanations repeatedly hurt learning, even when students describe her as nice.

Format shift

Teaching quality evidence is all in-person.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and quizzes matter, but and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and , many struggle with her accent and weak explanations.

Main concern

Heavy accent and fall behind.

What students said

“she is very hard to understand because of her thick accent.”
MATH35
“she and ”
MATH11
“If you need in .”
MAT52

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some classes allow note cards, open group quizzes, and easy , but and studying is required.

Note Cards AllowedOpen Group QuizzesExtra Credit on TestsShort TestsStudy Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and impactful, sometimes with note cards; quizzes may be open and group-based.

Note CardsOpen Group QuizzesExtra CreditShort Tests
“the and and in groups”
MAT37
“The , so studying WILL impact your grade tremendously.”
MATH11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you need in . Otherwise, knock yourself out.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 in-person , and mixed grading supports. Credibility rating: High.

🗣️ Accent Barrier

35/100

“she is very hard to understand because of her thick accent.”

📘

40/100

“if you read the book and do the .”

🔁

60/100

“she and ”

👍 Conditional Recommendation

42/100

“If you are . If .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her accent is very thick so its kinda hard to understand her
  • and does .
  • Great teacher if you know how to focus on what she is saying and the examples.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The , so studying WILL impact your grade tremendously.
  • I got A's and B's on all the tests, and she gave me a D.
  • Very easy if you have basic math skills.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • is a sweet and kind math teacher
  • but .
  • This instructor is very condescending.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

21 in-person reviews over many years show a consistent accent-and-self-study theme with enough detail for solid confidence.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MAT524 reviews
MATH523 reviews
MAT352 reviews
MAT362 reviews
MAT532 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH352 reviews
361 review
531 review
GEOMMATH1 review
MAT371 review
MATH111 review
MATH121 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1