AI Rate Professor

English

Sarah Buckner

ENGL50 · ENG28120 · ENG50 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

A strong pick for if you attend and do the work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringGives good feedbackClear grading criteriaHelpful one-on-oneAccessible by email
  • Students repeatedly describe her as caring and willing to help raise grades.
  • Feedback and and supportive.
  • One review notes rambling lectures, but still says the class is easy to pass if you show up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Comments stress that showing up, doing the work, and using her help makes passing and high grades realistic.

; no online reviews were available.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty sits around moderate with reading and participation, but not described as conceptually brutal.

; no online reviews were available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and note participation and skip-class penalties.

; no online reviews were available.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Three of and praise care and feedback; one would not due to lecture style.

; no online reviews were available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

She works with students who fall behind and is tagged for ; one review still calls her a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Expect reading and regular participation, but not an .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most call her caring, helpful, and knowledgeable; the main knock is occasional rambling in whole-class teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize feedback, participation, and coursework without a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Small in-person sample paints a and is mostly highly recommended.

Main concern

Occasional rambling lectures and .

What students said

“I fell a bit behind and she worked with me to get my grade up. She really cares about students.”
ENGL50
“Shes honestly the .”
ENG50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment talk centers on coursework and feedback.

Participation mattersFeedback-focused grading

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

security policies; success is tied to attendance, work, and her feedback.

ParticipationCoursework feedback
“ and its easy to pass, show up and do the work.”
ENG28120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is awesome. Shes super young and hip. She will go out of her way to help you if you ask. Shes honestly the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting care and support. Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Caring Support

90/100

“Sarah was a good teacher. I fell a bit behind and she worked with me to get my grade up. She really cares about students.”

📝

85/100

“She truly cared about helping her students and .”

🎯 Lecture Tradeoff

55/100

“She rambles a lot and you really don't learn much based on her ability to teach.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She really cares about students
  • She rambles a lot
  • when you talk to her one on one she is easy to understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • worked with me to get my grade up
  • its easy to pass, show up and do the work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

despite mostly consistent praise.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG502 reviews
ENG281201 review
ENGL501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values