AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rodrigo Gaitan

MATH160 · MATH52 · MATH046 · MATH12 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you learn well from dense lectures on your own; many students say .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture heavyUnclear explanationsLots of homeworkMultiple choice testsHit or miss
  • Some students love detailed lectures and multiple-choice tests; .
  • Homework and worksheets can be long, with few study guides for tests.
  • , but lecture clarity is the main risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some report easy multiple-choice tests and curves, but others struggle without study guides or .

All evidence is in person.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty spans and calculus-prep work.

Course difficulty varies by class level in the in-person sample.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Would-take-again is only about 40% and several .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Curves and multiple-choice tests help some, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Tags and comments cite lots of , and heavy note-taking.

Format shift

Workload evidence is in person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Praise for detail exists, but more students report confusion and .

Format shift

Teaching quality .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

; study guides are often missing while lectures and worksheets dominate prep.

Format shift

Assessment pattern described only in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Mixed in-person math experiences ranging from .

Main concern

Inconsistent clarity; several students say .

What students said

“I'd write 5-6 pages of notes every class period and leave the class each day not even knowing what I just learned.”
MATH160
“He is very nice, goes into full detail in his lectures and makes sure that everyone understands the topic before moving on.”
MATH046
“Avoid if possible! Run and don't look back.”
MATH12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some classes offer multiple-choice tests and , but .

Multiple choice testsCurved testsNo study guides

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and curved, yet students often lack study guides.

Multiple choice testsCurved testsNo study guides
“Awesome part is that he offers !!!!”
MATH046
“A plus was that ”
MATH12
“he gives a lot of notes & no study guides for ”
MATH12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I'd write 5-6 pages of notes every class period and leave the class each day not even knowing what I just learned.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, capturing the clarity split and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

35/100

“He has good intentions but .”

📚 Lecture Load

32/100

“Homework mostly consisted of in class worksheets that ”

👍 Positive Counterpoint

70/100

“If you attend his lectures you will do very well in his classes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • goes into full detail in his lectures
  • lectures are a bit heavy

Theme 2

📈

  • he offers
  • no study guides for tests

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • .
  • Avoid if possible! Run and don't look back.
  • plan on taking my next math with him as well

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews, short time span, sparse grades, and conflicting opinions reduce confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH122 reviews
MATH0461 review
MATH1601 review
MATH521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1