AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Li Chu

MAT12 · MATH35 · MAT35 · MAT52 · MATH12 · ALGEBMATH · MAT65 · MATH11 · MATH52 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the math well and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy accent barrierSelf-teach requiredHigh drop rateExam-heavyHard to understand
  • Most students cannot understand lectures because of a heavy accent.
  • Many report teaching themselves from the book or dropping.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

Exam-only structures and tough cutoffs mean an A .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Content difficulty is amplified because lectures are often incomprehensible and .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

At , and missing lectures worsens an already hard class.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Most students call her the and warn others to stay away.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

One detailed review says missing over 12 cumulative test problems kills any A; grades rest on few big tests.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is often exam- and , but self-teaching multiplies effort.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant theme is thick accent, unreadability of lectures, book-reading, and high failure or .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; a small minority call her fair or sweet.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Several reviews say grades rest on multiple large tests with little else, sometimes with .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math students overwhelmingly cite accent , and self-study.

Main concern

and needing the book or .

What students said

“The . I did not understand her at all”
MATH12
“easilly the .”
MAT12
“Did not understand a single word she said all semester.”
MATH52

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and little cushion; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person grading centers on multi-question tests, sometimes multiple choice, with strict cumulative miss limits.

Exam-based gradingMultiple large testsMultiple choice tests
“Class is based off of five 25 question tests and nothing else.”
MAT12
“The .”
MAT35

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She just needs to be fired and never be allowed to teach again.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person , and self-teaching. Credibility rating: High.

👎 Teaching Quality

18/100

“I could not understand a single word she said and she basically reads out of the book.”

🗣️ Accent Barrier

15/100

“BEWARE-She has a very thick and heavy Chinese accent.”

📉

20/100

“We had 45 students start and 18 when we finished”

🚫 Recommendation

16/100

“ she said.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not know how to teach at all.
  • she basically reads out of the book
  • Course content is boiled down to the basics.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hardest class of my life.
  • expect .
  • if more then 12 test problems cumulative are missed in the class, no chance for an A

Theme 3

📖

  • you're basically on your own.
  • You are going to have to teach yourself from the book
  • Make and you will pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen consistent in-person reviews across years strongly agree on accent and teaching problems despite a few positives.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MAT124 reviews
MAT352 reviews
MAT522 reviews
MATH122 reviews
MATH522 reviews
Show 5 more courses
12121 review
ALGEBMATH1 review
MAT651 review
MATH111 review
MATH351 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1